Skip to main content

NLRB General Counsel: College Athletes Are “Employees” Under the NLRA

 

Are you sitting down for this one?  If not, take a minute before reading further.

On September 29th, National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo issued a memo in which she stated that college athletes at private colleges/universities should be classified as employees under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”).  According to Abruzzo, these college athletes provide a financial benefit to their colleges/universities while the colleges/universities control the athletic activities of the players.  Abruzzo’s argument followed that these college athletes not being classified as employees is a violation of the NLRA.

Some readers might be thinking…ok, so what?  In short, if college athletes are found to be employees, they would gain the right organize and form a union, be entitled to compensation, open universities up to unemployment insurance/compensation matters, etc.

A few years ago, football players at Northwestern University had attempted to unionize but those efforts fell short when the NLRB held that the matter was out of its jurisdiction.  Notably, the NLRB did not rule on whether the Northwestern football players were actually employees.  In short, the NLRB kicked the can down the road.  Things have slowly started to trend the other way in recent years, namely with the United States Supreme Court holding in NCAA v. Alston that college athletes have a right to be compensated for their image and likeness.

It is important to note that Abruzzo’s memo does not set legal precedent or create new law.  With that being said, it does set things in motion for the NLRB to issue a decision holding that college athletes are employees.  If/when that does happen, however, it would only impact college athletes at private colleges/universities rather than public schools.  With that being said, if/when an eventual decision is handed down from the NLRB, the floodgates will open.


For a copy of Abruzzo’s memo:  https://apps.nlrb.gov/link/document.aspx/09031d458356ec26

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more