Skip to main content

Breaking: U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Block Vaccine Mandate For New York City School Employees

 

Late this afternoon, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor denied a request by New York City school employees that sought an injunction against a vaccine mandate in the workplace.

Readers might recall a note I posted earlier this week about how some New York City school employees were trying to contest the requirement that they get the coronavirus vaccine or risk being terminated.  The request that the Supreme Court issue an injunction was a last gasp effort to stop the vaccine policy from taking effect.  Justice Sotomayor, who handles emergency requests from New York, did not refer the matter to the entire Supreme Court.  (This is standard as each Supreme Court Justice handles emergency requests from particular parts of the country.  In this case, Justice Sotomayor hears matters out of New York.  It is at the discretion of each Justice to either decline a particular emergency request or to refer it to the entire Court.)  Therefore, it is possible that had the entire Supreme Court heard the matter, an injunction could have been issued (which is what the New York City school employees sought.)  Even with the denial of this request for an injunction, it is possible that the matter will still eventually wind up before the entire Supreme Court.

For the time being, based upon today’s denial by Justice Sotomayor, New York City school employees that refuse to get the coronavirus vaccine risk being terminated.


For additional information:  https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/10/01/politics/new-york-vaccine-school-sotomayor/index.html?__twitter_impression=true

For a copy of the Emergency Application to the Supreme Court:  https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21A50/194220/20210930135258574_Maniscalco%20v%20NYC%20Dept%20of%20Education%20-%20Emergency%20Application.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...