Skip to main content

Executive Order Creates Task Force Aimed At Making It Easier For Workers to Unionize

 

Stop me if you have heard this before:  President Joe Biden has been aggressively ramping up pro-union measures to help strengthen labor unions since he took office in January.  (For reference, take a look here, here, or here.)  

At the end of April, President Biden took another step to bolster labor unions when he issued an Executive Order to create a task force aimed at strengthening unions and helping workers unionize.  The Executive Order took umbrage with the federal government for having not used its “full authority” to support unions in the past and mandated a “comprehensive approach” be taken to advance union organizing and collective bargaining going forward.  As a result, the Task Force on Worker Organizing and Empowerment was created to advance these objectives.  The Task Force, chaired by Vice President Kamala Harris and Labor Secretary Marty Walsh, will make recommendations within 180 days on how to use the federal government’s policies, programs, and practices to empower workers to organize and successfully bargain with their employers.  Going one step further, the Task Force will also provide recommendations on how to “increase worker power” in parts of the country that have “hostile” labor laws and in industries that are difficult to organize.  (I am looking at you, Amazon and Alabama...)

Once these recommendations are made to President Biden and approved, the Task Force will be charged with implementing them and advancing a pro-union agenda.  Employers, buckle up.  This is about to get bump(ier).


For a copy of the Executive Order:  https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/04/26/executive-order-on-worker-organizing-and-empowerment/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...