Skip to main content

New Laws for 2021: Vaccine Anti-Retaliation Ordinance (Chicago)

 

On April 21st, the Chicago City Council passed the Vaccine Anti-Retaliation Ordinance (“Ordinance”) which establishes protections for Chicago workers that take time off work to get their vaccine.

The Ordinance requires employers in the city to allow workers to take time off to obtain their vaccine without retaliating against them in regard to their terms and conditions of employment.  Notably, this Ordinance applies regardless of whether the worker voluntarily chooses to get a vaccine or whether the employer requires it.

It is important to recognize that the Ordinance does not require employers to pay workers for the time off to get the vaccine (unless the employer mandates it.)  However, employers are required to allow workers to use any paid time off for time spent getting the vaccine during work hours.  With that being said, it is at a worker’s sole discretion whether or not to use paid time off to get the vaccine (as workers could instead simply choose not to be paid for this time spent getting the vaccine during work hours rather than using paid time off); employers are prohibited from required the use of paid time off.

For employers in the city that mandate getting the vaccine, they are required to pay workers for the time spent getting the vaccine (if the vaccine is during a work shift), at a worker’s regular rate of pay capped at four hours/vaccine dose.  These employers are prohibited from requiring workers to use paid time off as an alternative to paying them their regular rate of pay.

For Chicago employers that run afoul of the Ordinance, they could be subject to fines ranging from $1,000 - $5,000/violation.


For additional information:  https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/cdph/provdrs/health_protection_and_response/news/2021/april/city-council-passes-vaccine-anti-retaliation-ordinance-that-prov.htmlhttps://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/cdph/provdrs/health_protection_and_response/news/2021/april/city-council-passes-vaccine-anti-retaliation-ordinance-that-prov.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...