Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Gates v. Eagle Foods Group, LLC (Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division)

 

As with many labor & employment law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Gregory Gates (“Gates”) worked at Eagle Foods Group, LLC (“Eagle”) for a period of time as a sanitation and assembly line employee.  During his tenure with Eagle, he was required to scan his handprint each time he began and ended his workday as well as whenever he clocked in and out for breaks.  Gates filed a purported class action against Eagle on the grounds that the company violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”) by failing to publish retention schedules for biometric data and failing to destroy the biometric data, by systematically and automatically collecting biometric data without written release, and by systematically and automatically disclosing biometric data without first obtaining consent.

Eagle responded to the suit and argued the BIPA does not apply to the claims asserted by Gates because he is a former employee and therefore not covered under the BIPA.  As well, Eagle argued it did not “actively collect” Gates’ fingerprints, which it asserted was a requirement to be found liable under the BIPA.

After the case was moved to the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (at Eagle’s request), Gates moved to remand it back to the Circuit Court of Lake County.  The Northern District denied that request on the grounds that Eagle had properly notified Gates of the removal to the Northern District.  

At the present time, Eagle has moved to dismiss Gates’ case on the above referenced grounds.  At present, Eagle’s final reply is due on May 17th after which the Northern District is likely to make a ruling.  Biometric cases are sometimes few and far between (in regard to novel matters raised in the filings), but it will be interesting to see how the Northern District interprets the language of the BIPA...which will likely lead to Gates’ case surviving or getting tossed out.


For additional information:  https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/illinois/ilndce/1:2020cv06525/392878/30/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...