Skip to main content

CROWN Act Clears Louisiana Senate But Faces Uphill Battle in House

 

Last Thursday, the Louisiana Senate unanimously approved Senate Bill 61, the state’s CROWN Act (“Act”) with a 36 - 0 vote in favor of the legislation.  The legislation would make it illegal for employers in the state to discriminate against a worker on the basis of their hair texture or protective hairstyles such as braids and twists.  In doing so, Louisiana’s anti discrimination law, which currently bars employers from engaging in discriminatory employment practices on the basis of a worker’s race, religion, sex, or national origin would be amended to include discrimination on the basis of natural hairstyles.

While the Act sailed through the Senate, it is expected to face hurdles in the House.  A House Committee that considered the Act voted to advance it by a 7 - 4 vote.  Opponents of the legislation argued that if passed, the Act would lead to confusion among employers and expose them to endless litigation.  While three republicans on the Committee voted to advance the Act to the full House, it is expected that Republicans in the House will seek to stall the Act and prevent its passage.  With Republicans having majority control of the Louisiana House, it appears they could stymie the Act if they chose to...however, if a few Republicans supported the Act’s passage, Louisiana might become the next state to approve bans on employment discrimination in regard to a worker’s natural hairstyle.


For additional information:  https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/louisiana/articles/2021-05-06/la-lawmakers-split-on-hair-discrimination-bill-advance-it

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more