Skip to main content

Labor Secretary Voices Support For Classifying Gig Workers As Employees

 

Late last week, Labor Secretary Marty Walsh voiced his support for classifying gig workers (such as those that work for Uber, Lyft, Grubhub, etc.) as employees rather than independent contractors.

The announcement does not necessarily come as a surprise but rather one step closer to these gig workers being reclassified.  Many might now be wondering what happens next.  Well, in short, just because the Labor Department (and Biden administration) think that gig workers should be classified as employees does not automatically make it happen.  Instead, what would need to occur is for Congress to pass a measure (similar to California’s AB 5) that would reclassify gig workers across the country.  Bear in mind, however, that is no sure thing.  In fact, I would suggest that trying to get that measure through Congress (even with Democrats having majority control of both the House and Senate) is no sure thing.

Another “easier” option would be to have the Labor Department issue new rulings which would set the legal guideline for how employers treat workers.  With the Labor Secretary voicing his support for reclassifying gig workers, this is a more likely option.

For those wondering why gig employers are not keen to the idea of classifying their workers as employees, it in essence comes down to money.  Should these gig workers suddenly be classified as employees, they would be entitled to a minimum wage, overtime pay, paid leave, health insurance, etc.  It goes without saying that these gig employers would be on the hook for the increase in labor costs...which would drastically eat into their bottom line.  (It should come as no surprised that Uber, Lyft, and other related gig employers saw their stock prices tumble after the Labor Secretary’s comments last week.

I will reiterate that while nothing is official and there has been no change to how gig workers are classified in the U.S., this is one situation that is likely to change in the not too distant future.


For additional information:  https://www.reuters.com/world/us/exclusive-us-labor-secretary-says-most-gig-workers-should-be-classified-2021-04-29/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...