Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (U.S. Congress)

 

As with many labor & employment law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Pregnancy discrimination is often a much discussed topic in employment circles given the confusion over whether, and how, employers are required to accommodate pregnant workers.  With the introduction of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (“PWFA”) in Congress, that confusion may soon be coming to an end.

Under the proposed legislation, employment practices would be prohibited to the extent they discriminate against making reasonable accommodations for qualified employees affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.  (A “qualified employee” is defined as an employee or applicant who, with or without reasonable accommodations, can perform the essential functions of the position, with specified exceptions.

The PWFA would make it unlawful for employers to:  fail to make reasonable accommodations to known limitations of such employees unless the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on an entity’s business operation; require a qualified employee (as defined above) affected by such condition to accept an accommodation other than any reasonable accommodation arrived at through the interactive process; deny employment opportunities based upon the need of the entity to make such reasonable accommodations to a qualified employee; require such employees to take paid or unpaid leave if another reasonable accommodation can be provided; or take  adverse action in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment against a qualified employee requesting or using such reasonable accommodations.

Currently, the House of Representatives Rules Committee will meet this afternoon to prepare the bill for a floor vote.  After that is done, I would expect the PWFA to move quickly to a vote, which is widely expected to be approved.  (A prior version of the PWFA passed the House by a vote of 329 - 17 in 2020.)  With Democrats also having majority control of the Senate (and a bipartisan bill making its way through that chamber), I would expect the PWFA to reach President Joe Biden’s desk for signature sooner rather than later.


For additional information:  https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1065

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more