Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


One of the more closely watched labor law topics since President Joe Biden came into office has been the Protect the Right to Organize Act (also known as the PRO Act).  For those unaware, the PRO Act amounts to a compilation of wish list items that labor advocates have long sought, including expanding joint employer classifications, overriding state right to work laws, overturning prohibitions on secondary boycotts, and prohibiting employers from replacing economic strikers or locking out employees, among other far reaching ideas.  A majority, if not all, portions of the PRO Act are strongly opposed by Republicans and employers.  However, with Democrats having majority control of the House and Senate, and President Biden indicating his support for the legislation, should the PRO Act actually become law, it would drastically rewrite labor laws across the country in an extremely unfavorable way for employers.  Given the potential ramifications of that legislation, I have two articles I want to highlight on the matter this week.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Working Remotely & Able to Move? West Virginia Will Pay You $12,000 to Move There

Say no more, the title of this article says it all.  As NPR reports, for workers that are working remotely and that will agree to live in West Virginia for at least two years, the state will pay them $12,000 to move there and work remotely.  The program, dubbed Ascend WV, seeks to bring in workers that are no longer tied down to a physical workplace because of the coronavirus.  With reports of large cities such as New York City and San Francisco seeing a notable number of people leaving the high cost of living for a more affordable option, perhaps the Ascend WV program might just catch on.


West Virginia Senator Gives Needed Boost to PRO Act

Earlier this week, Democratic West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin indicated he would co-sponsor the Senate version of the PRO Act.  The Los Angeles Times notes that while Senator Manchin’s support for the legislation was no sure thing, his willingness to support the legislation is a big step in moving its passage closer to reality.  Granted, there is still a possibility (if not likelihood) of a filibuster stalling the legislation.  However, with the House of Representatives having already approved the PRO Act, I would suspect things will start to ramp up in the Senate now that Senator Manchin is on board.


State Attorneys General Voice Opposition to PRO Act

As noted above, while the PRO Act will soon start working its way through the Senate, that has not stopped opposition at the local level.  Earlier this month, South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson sent a letter to the Senate to voice opposition to the PRO Act.  The South Carolina Attorney General, joined by Attorneys General from 13 other states, has sought to make it clear that passage of the PRO Act goes against the will of a majority of states that have passed right to work laws...something that the PRO Act would outlaw.  Whether this opposition will move the needle remains to be seen, but it is likely that pressure will mount against the PRO Act as it moves through the Senate.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

Happening Tomorrow: Connecticut’s Minimum Wage Increases

For those employers and employees alike in Connecticut, mark your calendars as tomorrow, the minimum wage rate increases in the state from $13/hour to $14/hour. This wage hike comes after Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont had signed Public Act 19-4 into law in 2019 which progressively raised the state’s hourly minimum wage rate every year for five years.  In fact, next year, the hourly wage rate will top out at $15/hour.  Beginning in January of 2024, the hourly wage rate will be indexed to the employment cost index. For additional information:   https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2022/06-2022/Governor-Lamont-Reminds-Residents-That-Minimum-Wage-Is-Scheduled-To-Increase-on-Friday
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more