Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: President Biden Edition

 

Several months into his presidency and Joe Biden has been quite active in regard to labor & employment law matters.  Following his abrupt termination of Peter Robb at the National Labor Relations Board and unsuccessful efforts to get Congress to approve a $15/hour minimum wage rate, President Biden has been full steam ahead in recent weeks to push more employee and labor friendly initiatives.  In doing so, I think it is appropriate to focus this post on several recent developments that have come out of the White House.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Executive Order Issued to Increase Federal Contract Worker Pay Rate

This past Tuesday, President Biden signed an executive order to increase the pay rate for federal contract workers to $15/hour, up from its current base rate of $10.95/hour.  A few things to note here.  First, it is estimated that nearly 400,000 federal contractors will receive a higher wage.  As well, all federal agencies will be required to include this higher wage rate in all contract offerings starting January 30 of next year.   In addition, the tipped minimum wage rate of $7.65/hour for federal contractors would be replaced in 2024 with the standard minimum ($15/hour +, depending upon the indexed inflation rate.)  Notably, the wage hike is indexed to inflation and will increase each year.  While President Biden has yet to get the federal minimum wage rate up to $15/hour, this is a step in the right direction for minimum wage advocates.


Emergency COVID Workplace Safety Rules One Step Closer to Reality

Upon coming into office, President Biden made workplace safety a key talking point, given the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.  While the new administration gave the Labor Department until March 15th to decide whether mandatory workplace safety rules were needed, that deadline came and went.  However, upon being confirmed by the Senate, new Labor Secretary Marty Walsh has gotten to work.  On Monday, the Labor Department sent proposed safety standards to the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) for review.  According to reports, the proposed safety standards would require employers to provide workers with masks, have a written plan to avert exposure to the coronavirus in the workplace, and take other related safety precautions.  It is expected the OMB will take two weeks before the safety rules are published, which would then likely take effect immediately.  Upon taking effect, these new safety rules will be in place for the next six months.


Paid Leave Proposal Part of $1.8 Trillion Spending Plan

On Wednesday, President Biden announced his support of a paid leave plan which would provide twelve weeks of paid leave per year for workers that take time off to recover from a health issue or serious illness, to deal with a family member’s military deployment, to address domestic violence, to care for a new child, to care for an ill family member, or following the death of a loved one.  The proposal, estimated to cost $225 billion (which is part of the $1.8 trillion spending plan), would replace two thirds of a workers’ average wages up to $4,000/month.  As a result, a worker could receive as much as $12,000 over the course of the twelve week paid leave program.  Of course, announcing this proposal does not make it law...but with President Biden pushing for it (and an apparent appetite in Congress to get some sort of paid leave law passed), this has the possibility of making it through Congress.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...