Skip to main content

Gig Companies Launch Campaign to Get Referendum on California's 2020 Ballot


Last week, Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash launched a campaign in which these gig companies are attempting to put a referendum on the 2020 ballot in California which will provide them with an exemption from Assembly Bill 5 (previously signed into law earlier this year by Governor Gavin Newsom.)

For those needing a refresher, Assembly Bill 5 codifies the ABC test to determine whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee.  Generally speaking, this ABC test makes it easier for workers to be classified as employees...and therefore entitled to protections of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the ability to unionize, obtain overtime, paid time off, etc.  Needless to say, gig companies that classify their workers as independent contractors have viewed Assembly Bill 5 as problematic.  Since the passage of Assembly Bill 5, there has been much speculation that these gig companies would try and find a way to carve out an exemption.  (When talks to have this exemption included in the language of Assembly Bill 5 fell apart, many expected a ballot referendum would be attempted.)

In an effort to try and attract support for the ballot measure, Uber and Lyft have promised to pay its drivers at least 20% more than the minimum wage rate along with $.30/mile to cover the wear and tear on vehicles.  Going one step further, the drivers would also be paid a stipend to cover healthcare costs and be given accident insurance.  Of course, all of this is in exchange for Assembly Bill 5 not applying to these companies or their workers.

While 2020 is still a ways off (and there is no guarantee that this referendum will actually get on the ballot), it is expected these gig companies will spend upwards of $90 million to get the measure before voters in the state next year.


For additional information:  https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-10-29/uber-lyft-doordash-fight-california-labor-law-ab5

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more