Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Every so often I come across a jury verdict that catches my attention.  This week, a case out of a federal court in Texas piqued my interest in so much as a jury was asked to decide whether an employee was discriminated against because that employee chose to attend church rather than work...and was subsequently terminated by the employer.  Quite the intriguing read.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Effort to Slow Minimum Wage Hike in New Jersey Falters

On Wednesday, a scheduled vote in New Jersey’s Senate Labor Committee was shelved on a bill that would have allowed for a slowdown to the state’s minimum wage hike.  The proposed legislation sought to allow for temporary suspension of scheduled minimum wage hikes in the state, depending upon whether economic conditions worsened or unemployment rates rose.  Readers might recall that a minimum wage bill had been signed into law which would gradually raise minimum wage rates from $10/hour up to $15/hour by 2024 for most workers in the state.  The proposed bill that was shelved yesterday had come under heavy fire from Democrats in the state as well as 2020 Democratic Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders.  As of now, the state’s minimum wage hike is set to go into effect as previously signed into law by Governor Phil Murphy.


Grading the Paid Leave Policies of the 2020 Presidential Candidates

Recently, PL+US released a scorecard for how the 2020 Presidential candidates stack up in regard to their paid leave proposals.  (PL+US is an advocacy group that focuses on advancing paid leave in the country.)  While readers can review the report for the criteria and grading system utilized, there are several scores to note:  A 65 for President Donald Trump, a 70 for former Vice President Joe Biden and Senator Elizabeth Warren, and a 100 for Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.  I will caution readers that this is only one report and it’s findings are not an exact science, but this scorecard does provide a good overview of the paid leave proposals of the candidates.


Is Termination of Employee That Skips Work For Church Religious Discrimination?

According to a jury in Texas, the answer to the above question is a resounding yes.  In Davis v. Fort Bend County, an employee notified her employer that because of her church obligations on a Sunday, she could not be present at work for a special work project.  Despite offering to find a replacement to fill her spot, the employee was terminated after failing to appear for work and instead going to church.  A jury held that the employee was discriminated against because of her religion and her employer was able to reasonably accommodate the employee’s religious beliefs yet failed to do so.  I invite readers to read the jury verdict for further insight into the jury’s findings.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more