Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


For those coming off a sugar high after tearing into Halloween candy last night (and maybe even into this morning too), my sympathies are with you.  To help take the edge off, I have highlighted a few articles of relevance this week.  While there is somewhat of a labor heavy tilt to this week's articles, the below are well worth a read.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Joe Biden Releases Labor Friendly Proposals

A week ago, Joe Biden announced several aggressive proposals that would greatly benefit labor unions and their supporters.  Of note, Biden has advocated for allowing card check elections to occur (which is an informal process in which authorization forms are collected from a majority of a bargaining unit, rather than conducting the "traditional" secret ballot election), creating a "cabinet level working group" comprised of labor representatives to increase union density, holding corporate executives personally liable for interfering with organizing efforts and violations of labor laws, and penalize companies that bargain in bad faith.  Now the viability of a majority of these proposals depend upon Biden winning the Democratic Presidential nomination (and actually winning the general election in 2020.)  For the time being, as with many Presidential candidates, releasing these proposals and getting people talking is half the battle.



The Lexington Herald Leader reported last week that the Blackjewel, LLC coal company agreed to pay $5.1 million in back pay, following a nearly two month long protest by coal miners.  Issues arose after the company suddenly went bankrupt, yet nearly 1,700 miners were left holding the bucket without having received payment (or having their paychecks bounce.)  The miners staged a protest at the mine, going so far as to sit on the train tracks to prevent coal from leaving.  The issue went on to draw national attention, with the miners calling on President Donald Trump to step in and help resolve the issue.  For the time being, this is a positive resolution as the miners will receive the back pay that they had been aggressively pursuing.



In the past few weeks, Google employees have reported that the company has developed an internal surveillance tool that is equipped to monitor workers' attempts to organize, create protests, and talk about labor rights.  As Ryan Gallagher at Time reports, the Google employees state that a new tool was being created for the Google Chrome browser that was installed on all workers' computers.  The tool apparently has the capability to report staffers that create a calendar event with more than 10 rooms or 100 participants.  The employees claim it "is an attempt of [Google] leadership to immediately learn about any workers organization attempts."  Google has responded and denied the allegation, instead claiming that the tool is "a pop-up reminder that asks people to be mindful before auto-adding a meeting to the calendars of large numbers of employees."  Google has also stated that it does not collect personally identifiable information nor does it stop the use of calendars.  Something tells me that those employees which were already suspicious of the new tool will not be assuaged by Google's explanation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more