Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Heading into the homestretch of November normally means things are slowing down a bit with hearings, trial, etc., but I have found myself traveling more over the past few weeks than normal.  While that has kept me tied up, I did take some time the past few days to read through a few articles worth pointing out to readers.  Of course, with the 2020 Presidential elections upcoming, I expect we will come across more articles on how the candidates stand on particular labor and employment law related matters.  Consider the below two articles on 2020 candidates as an appetizer.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


The Danger of Allowing “Ok, Boomer” In the Workplace

The phrase “Ok, boomer” has started to become more pronounced in recent weeks, as millennials and Gen-Z use it as a term to deride and dismiss baby boomers.  The National Law Review weighed in last week and pointed out that if the phrase is used in the workplace, there is the risk of employers being liable for discrimination against workers because of their age.  (The Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and many state laws, prohibit discrimination against workers on the basis of their age.)  If the phrase “Ok, boomer” is allowed to seep into the workplace, it could form the basis for a discrimination or harassment claim.


Senator Bernie Sanders Earns Major Endorsement From Teachers Union

Last week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders earned the endorsement of United Teachers Los Angeles, an influential union in California.  The endorsement is striking for a few reasons:  This is the first teachers’ union to hand out an endorsement this election cycle, as well as the fact that the union has thrown its support behind Sanders rather than Senator Kamala Harris (one of the California’s Senators.)  Not to worry for Senator Harris though; she recently picked up the endorsement of the United Farm Workers.  With unions expected to play a major role in the 2020 Democratic nomination process, each union endorsement helps further establish a candidate’s claim as the ‘labor friendly’ choice for President.


7 Tips For Improving Workplace Culture

As any good Human Resources professional will tell you, creating (and maintaining) a positive, safe, and productive work environment is paramount to the continued success of a business.  An article was posted on Monday which identified seven tips for employers to implement to improve their workplace culture.  Now while the article has tailored several of the tips to those in the hotel and service industry, there are still a few useful ideas for readers, regardless of the industry in which you work.  One of the potentially more useful ideas has to do with implementing bystander intervention techniques to help quell harassing or threatening situates they arise.  While every tip might not be appropriate to implement in your workplace, this article should still serve as a helpful read.


Where the 2020 Candidates (and President Trump) Stand on Paid Leave

Paid leave has certainly been a topic of much conversation over the past few years, right?  (In fact, Wednesday’s Democratic Presidential debate featured a question within the first hour in which Senator Kamala Harris, Senator Amy Klobuchar, and Andrew Yang all weighed in on their support for paid leave.)  HRDive posted an article (updated through November 20th) which identifies where each of the 2020 candidates for President (as well as President Donald Trump) stand on paid leave.  (Apologies to Michael Bloomberg and Deval Patrick; this article only addresses the candidates that have formally announced their candidacies.)  While not everyone has an announced plan, the article does note whether a candidate has supported other proposals in the past or campaigned alongside politicians pushing a prior proposal.  Bear in mind that positions on the matter can (and likely will) change.  For the time being, this article should serve as a useful primer on the topic.


Updated: U.S. House of Representatives Passes Workplace Violence Bill

Yesterday, I made note of H.R. 1309, a workplace violence bill that was set for a vote in the U.S. House of Representatives.  In broad terms, the legislation seeks to provide greater protections for healthcare and social workers by requiring their employers to implement violence protection programs.  As the article from Business Insider reports, the legislation passed yesterday with a 251-158 vote in favor.  The legislation now moves over to the Senate for further debate, consideration, and possible vote.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more