Skip to main content

California Trucking Association Files Suit to Block Implementation of Assembly Bill 5


Yesterday, the California Trucking Association filed suit in federal court, seeking to block implementation of Assembly Bill 5.

Readers will recall that the California Legislature passed Assembly Bill 5 recently, which Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law.  As a refresher, Assembly Bill 5 codified the ABC test, created by a California Supreme Court decision.  That ABC test makes it easier for workers to be classified as employees rather than independent contractors.  (The new law is set to go into effect January 1, 2020.)  Many large scale employers in the state, including Lyft & Uber, have since gone on the offensive as they seek to be exempt from the new law.

The California Trucking Association’s lawsuit claims Assembly Bill 5 runs afoul of federal law because the ABC test is preempted by constitutional clauses regarding federal supremacy and commerce.  Further, the lawsuit alleged that the ABC test conflicts with federal laws for motor carriers and transportation.  Interesting enough, the California Trucking Association also has claimed that truck drivers in the state want to remain classified as independent contractors do as to maintain their ability to provide services as owner-operators of their rigs.  (Presumably, this “freedom” would vanish if the truck drivers became employees.

The end goal of the lawsuit?  To obtain a ruling that the ABC test not apply to the trucking industry.  While it is still too early to predict the outcome of the legislation, I would not be surprised if a temporary injunction were issued to prevent Assembly Bill 5 from going into effect while this lawsuit plays out further.


For a copy of the lawsuit:  https://01a3edcb-713b-4446-a7f4-8c833b6d990e.filesusr.com/ugd/7c8ac7_8b183e17b4e64b168c01ee094b592ba4.pdf

For additional information:  https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sfchronicle.com/business/amp/Trucking-group-sues-to-be-exempted-from-14829931.php

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more