Skip to main content

Following Passage of Assembly Bill 5, Attention Turns to Gig Companies


Readers will likely recall the long, hard fought struggle to get Assembly Bill 5 approved by the California Legislature and before Governor Gavin Newsome before the legislative session ended.  For supporters of Assembly Bill 5, that hard fought battle resulted in the measure reaching the Governor's desk and being signed into law.

Many are likely wondering what happens next.  Before we get there, let us take a step back and look at the big picture.  Assembly Bill 5 sought to codify the ABC test (created by the Dynamex v. Operations West, Inc. 2018 California Supreme Court case) in which workers in the state could be more easily classified as employees rather than independent contractors.  This meant that many gig companies, such as Uber & Lyft which classify their drivers as independent contractors rather than employees, were at risk of having their workers potentially re-classified as employees which would open a host of "issues" for these companies.  (I use the word "issues" loosely here as if these workers were re-classified as employees, they would be entitled to paid time off, sick leave, an increase in pay, etc. which would impact the bottom line and business models of these gig companies.)  Now just because Assembly Bill 5 was signed into law does not mean that those workers at gig companies would immediately become employees.  Quite the opposite.  Rather, once the law takes effect next year, it will be easier for these workers to establish that they are actually employees rather than independent contractors (as the ABC test is more favorable to establishing these workers are actually employees.)

With the passage of Assembly Bill 5, it is expected that over 1 million workers in the state will be impacted.  Nevertheless, the gig companies have sought ways to skirt the scope of the new law.  Those efforts include trying to negotiate a compromise with lawmakers and threatening to put the matter before voters to decide.

Now the legislation is not set to take effect until January 1st of next year so there is still some time for the gig companies to get their ducks in a row.  I would expect there will be legal challenges filed to the validity and enforceability of the law.  Stay tuned.  This fight is likely far from over.


For additional information:  https://gizmodo.com/ab5-landmark-bill-protecting-gig-workers-in-california-1838222549

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies i...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more