Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Workforce Mobility Act of 2019 (U.S. Congress)


As with many employment and labor law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Earlier this month, a bi-partisan piece of legislation was introduced in Congress entitled the "Workforce Mobility Act of 2019" which is intended to curb the use of non-compete agreements in the workplace.

The bill, introduced by Republican Senator Todd Young and Democratic Senator Chris Murphy, would aggressively reduce the use of non-competes and allow them to be used only for the "necessary instance of a dissolution of a partnership or the sale of a business."  With one recent study having found that non-competes have impacted nearly 40% of the workforce, the Senators have argued that non-competes are improperly infringing upon the ability of workers to move on to new jobs.  Consequently, this legislation seeks to scale back the use of non-competes and goes so far as to require employers to make their employees aware of the limitations of non-competes (should this legislation come to pass.)

Some readers might recall that prior attempts have been made to curtail the use of non-competes; however, those prior attempts to pass legislation in Congress have come up short.  Whether this bi-partisan legislation can garner enough support to become law remains to be seen.  However, with a Democratic House of Representatives that would likely be receptive to this legislation (and a fairly even split in the Senate among Republicans and Democrats), the ultimate question might be whether President Donald Trump would sign it into law if it reached his desk.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies i...

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...