Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


With a trial earlier this week and another one upcoming at the start of next week, I have been buried in trial prep most of the past week or so.  When I have had a chance to take a break, I have come across some good articles that are worth highlighting.  With several prominent developments on the labor law front over the past few weeks, I wanted to give readers a bit more variety this week.  (Of course, notwithstanding the article below in regard to how some of the Democratic Presidential candidates stack up in regard to their labor law positions...)

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Grading the Labor Plans of the Democratic Presidential Candidates

Last week, Steven Greenhouse wrote an article in which he gave an overview of the labor plans of several of the Democratic Presidential candidates and scored each one on how labor friendly it was.  (For kicks, Greenhouse scored President Donald Trump's labor positions as well.)  While some things have changed, notably with Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar releasing a revised labor proposal this past Sunday, this article is worth a read for those looking for a broad overview of where many of the Democratic candidates stand in regard to big labor.


Labor Department Settles Pay and Racial Bias Claims Made Against Three Large Companies

Bloomberg published an article on Monday in which it noted that the Labor Department has announced settlements with three large companies over pay and racial bias claims made against the companies.  The companies, Goldman Sachs, Dell Technologies, and Bank of America, will reportedly pay over $20 million combined to resolve the claims.  The Bloomberg articles is worth a read as it goes more in depth as to the allegations made against the companies.


With the Implementation of the New Overtime Rules, Remember to Review Your Own Practice

Readers will recall that last week, the Labor Department published its new overtime rules that change the rules in regard to when workers are entitled to earn overtimeHRDive has a rather extensive analysis of how the new overtime rule will apply to certain workers and provides readers with suggestions on how they can ensure compliance with the new rule before it takes effect January 1, 2020.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...