Skip to main content

Following Passage of Assembly Bill 5, Attention Turns to Gig Companies


Readers will likely recall the long, hard fought struggle to get Assembly Bill 5 approved by the California Legislature and before Governor Gavin Newsome before the legislative session ended.  For supporters of Assembly Bill 5, that hard fought battle resulted in the measure reaching the Governor's desk and being signed into law.

Many are likely wondering what happens next.  Before we get there, let us take a step back and look at the big picture.  Assembly Bill 5 sought to codify the ABC test (created by the Dynamex v. Operations West, Inc. 2018 California Supreme Court case) in which workers in the state could be more easily classified as employees rather than independent contractors.  This meant that many gig companies, such as Uber & Lyft which classify their drivers as independent contractors rather than employees, were at risk of having their workers potentially re-classified as employees which would open a host of "issues" for these companies.  (I use the word "issues" loosely here as if these workers were re-classified as employees, they would be entitled to paid time off, sick leave, an increase in pay, etc. which would impact the bottom line and business models of these gig companies.)  Now just because Assembly Bill 5 was signed into law does not mean that those workers at gig companies would immediately become employees.  Quite the opposite.  Rather, once the law takes effect next year, it will be easier for these workers to establish that they are actually employees rather than independent contractors (as the ABC test is more favorable to establishing these workers are actually employees.)

With the passage of Assembly Bill 5, it is expected that over 1 million workers in the state will be impacted.  Nevertheless, the gig companies have sought ways to skirt the scope of the new law.  Those efforts include trying to negotiate a compromise with lawmakers and threatening to put the matter before voters to decide.

Now the legislation is not set to take effect until January 1st of next year so there is still some time for the gig companies to get their ducks in a row.  I would expect there will be legal challenges filed to the validity and enforceability of the law.  Stay tuned.  This fight is likely far from over.


For additional information:  https://gizmodo.com/ab5-landmark-bill-protecting-gig-workers-in-california-1838222549

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more