Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


While I watched some of the Democratic Presidential debate this past week to see if there were any breaking employment or labor law policies unveiled, nothing of substance was announced.  So while we could parse the specifics of the debate and try to find some way to shoehorn it into the blog, I think there are other developments that warrant more attention this week.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


U.S. Soccer Federation Seeks to Block Class Action Certification in Gender Discrimination Suit

Readers will likely recall that the U.S. Women's National Soccer Team has filed a gender discrimination suit against the U.S. Soccer Federation and garnered significant attention over the past few months.  After settlement talks broke down at mediation back in August, this case is slowly moving forward to trial next May.  However, there are likely still quite a few legal maneuvers that both sides will play, including the U.S. Soccer Federation filing a motion on September 30th seeking to block class certification.  The U.S. Soccer Federation argues that because the team's top four players, Alex Morgan, Megan Rapinoe, Carli Lloyd, and Becky Sauerbrunn earned (significantly) more compared to the rest of the team, these four players cannot adequately represent the class.  This is an interesting argument to make and likely one that will be met with derision from supporters of the suit.


Striking Teachers Embrace New Strategy to Win Public Support

Kathleen Foody at The AP wrote an article earlier in the week in which she noted that striking teachers across the country have started to adopt a new strategy while engaged in contract discussions:  Focusing the discussion on class sizes and student services.  As noted in the article, this "social justice" strategy has seen some positive results in the past, with striking teachers using these "talking points" to help garner public support for their strikes.  (Speaking in broad terms, it does not hurt to have these be the focal points of contract talks.  It is likely easier to get more public support by focusing on class sizes and hiring more support staff rather than getting into the nitty gritty of paid time off, benefits, etc.)  With teachers in Chicago threatening to strike, implementing this strategy could prove to be helpful in putting the teachers (and their union) in a better bargaining position.


Employees, Mental Health & the Workplace

A topic that often gets overlooked (or ignored completely) in the workplace is the mental health of employees.  Now while every situation is different and I am not going to specifically advise employers and employees alike on what to do when confronted with a mental health related matter in the workplace, David Greeneq at Thrive Global does a good job addressing the matter head on.  In particular, I call attention to the article’s suggestion that employers work to reduce the stigma around mental health and work to create an open dialogue with employees dealing with a mental health related matter.  Again, I remind readers that not every situation is identical and dealing with a mental health related matter in the workplace should be carefully handled.  When in doubt, consult an HR professional or employment law related attorney for additional assistance.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more