Skip to main content

Chicago’s Mayor Proposes Quicker Minimum Wage Hike For Many, But Not All, Workers


Last week, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, announced her proposal for hourly workers in the city to earn $15/hour by 2021, four years sooner than the rest of the state.  However, this proposal would only see tipped workers in the city earning 60% of that.

Many readers are likely wondering what the specifics are of the Mayor’s proposal.  Let us take a closer look:


  • Chicago’s $13/hour minimum wage rate would rise to $14/hour on July 1, 2020 and then again to $15/hour in 2021. 
  • Further wage hikes would be guaranteed and tied to the consumer price index.  However, further wage hikes would be capped at 2.5%. 
  • Hourly workers under the age of 18 would be able to obtain a $15/hour wage more gradually, eventually reaching that wage rate by 2024. 
  • By 2025, the city would abolish the minimum wage exemption for teen workers. 
  • Employers with 20 or fewer employees would be given more time to raise their hourly pay rates, eventually reaching $15/hour by 2023.
  • Employers with 4 or fewer employees would be exempt. 

Some might wonder why the Mayor’s proposal would only minimally impact tipped workers.  The Mayor indicated these tipped workers were for the large part excluded from her proposal, out of concern for how it would impact small businesses.

Many Chicago politicians expressed concern over the fact that tipped workers would not benefit from this proposal, namely because poverty apparently plagues many tipped workers in the city.  (Only allowing these hourly workers to realize a 60% benefit of the proposal would therefore do little to help poverty rates in the city.)  While I do not think the Mayor’s proposal will ultimately be approved, I would expect this to be a stepping stone to helping hourly workers in the city see their wages increase before the rest of the state.  Whether tipped workers in the city can find their way into this, or another, proposal is likely the key thing to watch going forward.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...