Skip to main content

Chicago’s Mayor Proposes Quicker Minimum Wage Hike For Many, But Not All, Workers


Last week, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, announced her proposal for hourly workers in the city to earn $15/hour by 2021, four years sooner than the rest of the state.  However, this proposal would only see tipped workers in the city earning 60% of that.

Many readers are likely wondering what the specifics are of the Mayor’s proposal.  Let us take a closer look:


  • Chicago’s $13/hour minimum wage rate would rise to $14/hour on July 1, 2020 and then again to $15/hour in 2021. 
  • Further wage hikes would be guaranteed and tied to the consumer price index.  However, further wage hikes would be capped at 2.5%. 
  • Hourly workers under the age of 18 would be able to obtain a $15/hour wage more gradually, eventually reaching that wage rate by 2024. 
  • By 2025, the city would abolish the minimum wage exemption for teen workers. 
  • Employers with 20 or fewer employees would be given more time to raise their hourly pay rates, eventually reaching $15/hour by 2023.
  • Employers with 4 or fewer employees would be exempt. 

Some might wonder why the Mayor’s proposal would only minimally impact tipped workers.  The Mayor indicated these tipped workers were for the large part excluded from her proposal, out of concern for how it would impact small businesses.

Many Chicago politicians expressed concern over the fact that tipped workers would not benefit from this proposal, namely because poverty apparently plagues many tipped workers in the city.  (Only allowing these hourly workers to realize a 60% benefit of the proposal would therefore do little to help poverty rates in the city.)  While I do not think the Mayor’s proposal will ultimately be approved, I would expect this to be a stepping stone to helping hourly workers in the city see their wages increase before the rest of the state.  Whether tipped workers in the city can find their way into this, or another, proposal is likely the key thing to watch going forward.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...