Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Equal Pay Edition


A few weeks ago we had posts dedicated to labor law and HR related matters.  Following several equal pay related posts over the past few weeks (and the fact that I came across several other equal pay related articles this week), I thought it appropriate to dedicate this post to that very topic.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Jackson Mississippi City Council Approves Equal Pay Ordinance

A few weeks ago, the Jackson Mississippi City Council unanimously approved an equal pay ordinance for city workers, set to take effect on June 14th.  Of note, the ordinance prohibits city job applicants from being asked about their salary history as well as requiring city workers to be paid based on (and not deviate) from the city's official plan.  Private employers in Jackson are not covered under this ordinance; only city employees.  With that being said, this is a broad step forward for city workers.



Sarah Elms at The Blade wrote an article earlier this month in which she provided an update on the equal pay ordinance currently being considered by the Toledo City Council.  In essence, the ordinance seeks to bar Toledo employers from asking applicants about their salary history, which would instead have employers set an applicant's salary based upon their experience (rather than their gender.)  There is some disagreement among the City Council, with some suggesting this ordinance would help curb the wage gap while others have argued it would impose an unnecessary level of regulation on employers in Toledo.  Whether there is enough support among the Toledo City Council to get this equal pay ordinance across the finish line remains to be seen.  Stay tuned.



Recently, by a 9 - 6 vote, the Louisiana House Labor Committee rejected bills that would have let local authorities determine their own minimum wage rates and implement equal pay measures.  Although there has been widespread support among Democrats in the state to approve such measures, the particular bills could not find enough support to advance.  With that being said, with equal pay becoming an even more hot button issue (due in no small part to the upcoming 2020 Presidential election), I would not be surprised to see similar legislation be introduced in the Louisiana Legislature sooner rather than later.



Speaking in broad terms, equal pay laws should achieve their intended affect of bringing about pay equality in the workplace.  However, as Quentin Fottrell at MarketWatch writes, there are some drawbacks that have been reported.  Of note, a recent study has found that salary transparency has led some employers to lower overall salaries rather than lifting a woman's salary to the level of their male co-workers.  That should be nothing short of concerning as women in the workplace might appear to be increasing their salary when it is actually instead a matter of employers lowering salaries across the board.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...