Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Having spent most of the week on the road for work. I had limited time between hearings and a trial to read through many articles.  Regardless, with a bit of spare time at hotels, I was able to multitask and read through a few good articles while also watching both nights of the 2020 Democratic Presidential debates to see how the candidates addressed relevant labor and employment law topics. 

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


D.C.'s Ban the Box Law Nets $500,000.00 in Fines Against Employers

Since the District of Columbia passed a ban the box law prohibiting employers from asking applicants about their criminal history, there have been a host of fines imposed against employers for breaking this law.  With more than $500,000.00 in fines imposed, it is evident that even with a ban the box law in place, some employers are still running afoul of the law.  With that being said, as this article from The Washington Post notes, the number of charges filed has decreased since the law went into effect a few years ago...from more than 400 charges in fiscal year 2015 to less than 100 in fiscal year 2018.  It goes without saying that for employers living in cities or states with ban the box laws in place, it is important to not ask applicants about their salary histories or risk getting hit with a fine like many employers in D.C. have faced.


Minimum Wage & the 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidates

Some readers might have watched the Democratic Presidential debates this past Wednesday and Thursday.  On Wednesday night, the question of equal pay came up not less than ten minutes into the debate when former Secretary of Housing & Urban Development Julian Castro was asked how he would address equal pay matters in the country.  Notably, he responded that if he were elected President, he would support passage of an equal pay for equal work law.  (Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard was asked to address the same topic but skirted the issue without giving specifics about how she would tackle equal pay as President.)  On the topic of Presidential candidates, Politico recently published an overview of the position of each 2020 Democratic Presidential candidate in regard to their stance on the minimum wage rate.  For those looking for a concise guide on how each candidate stands on the minimum wage topic, this article is well worth a read.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more