Skip to main content

Colorado Implements Equal Pay Law...Effective January 1, 2021


A week or two ago, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed the Equal Pay For Equal Work Act into law which is set to take effect January 1, 2021.

This new legislation prohibits employers in the state from paying their employees different wages based upon an employee’s sex or the basis of sex in connection with another protected status (ie disability, race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, religion, age, national origin, or ancestry) unless one of the Act’s exceptions applies.  As well, employers will be prohibited from asking about an applicant’s wage rate history or discriminating or retaliating against an applicant for failing to disclose their wage rate history.

As noted, there are certain exceptions provided for by the Act that allow an employer to pay different wages based on sex if the employer is able to establish the difference in wages is reasonably based upon any of the following factors:  a seniority system; a merit system; a system that measures earnings by quantity or quality of production; the geographic location of where the work is performed; education, training, or experience to the extent they are reasonably related to the work in question; or travel if the travel is a regular and necessary condition of the work performed.

In addition, once the Act takes effect in 2021, employers will be required to announce to all employees employment advancement opportunities and job openings (and the pay range of the job openings.)  Further, employers will be required to maintain records of job descriptions and wage rate history for each employee for the duration of their employment, plus two years.

For those aggrieved employees, they will have a two year statute of limitations for their claims under the Act.  Notably, a violation of the Act occurs each time a person is paid a discriminatory wage rate. Accordingly, employees are entitled to recover both economic and liquidated damages along with their attorney’s fees and other equitable relief.  One benefit extended to employers is a good faith defense in so much that they can avoid paying liquidated damages if they can show that they had a reasonable basis for believing their pay rates were not in violation of the Act.

With over a year and a half until the Act takes effect, employers in Colorado would be wise to start implementing steps to ensure they are in compliance with the Act by January 1, 2021.


For additional information:  https://www.natlawreview.com/article/colorado-enacts-equal-pay-equal-work-law-effective-2021

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...