Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


This week, we have a little something for everyone:  a proposed change to the overtime salary threshold, the ongoing gig economy worker classification fight in California, Nevada’s new law re hiring applicants with a positive marijuana test, an update on a parental paid leave policy in Congress, and a New York law that allows employees paid time off to vote.  This is quite the week of developments, to say the least.   

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Ohio Senator Pushes For Higher Overtime Salary Threshold

As WVXU writes, Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown has recently started advocating for a new overtime salary threshold that is higher than what had been proposed during the President Barack Obama administration ($47,476/year)  as well as higher than what has been proposed by the President Donald Trump administration ($35,303/year.)  Senator Brown has proposed raising the current overtime salary threshold from $23,660/year to $51,064/year.  For those unaware, employees with a salary below the salary threshold must be paid overtime if these employees work more than 40 hours in a week.  Needless to say, any change in the overtime salary threshold would have a widespread impact on both employers and employees alike.  Is there room for negotiation here?  Most likely.  However, with Republicans having majority control of the Senate, Senator Brown’s proposal will need to fund at least a few Republican Senators for support or risk falling apart.


Uber & Lyft Go on the Offensive, Fearing Impact of New ABC Test

Jeremy White at Politico wrote a good article earlier this month in which he noted the newfound offensive that both Uber & Lyft have started to go on in California.  Readers will recall that a new ABC Test was created to determine whether a worker was an independent contractor or employee.  This test makes it more difficult for employers to classify workers as independent contractors.  Predictably, these ride sharing companies have started to become concerned that the California Legislature will codify the ABC Test and have started to take steps to prevent this from happening.  Of note, in exchange for an agreement that Uber & Lyft drivers would remain independent contractors, these ride sharing companies would offer "a series of basic commitments on driver earning" and other related matters such as drivers being able to opt into benefits.  Whether this push by Uber & Lyft produces their intended result remains to be seen...but it is worth noting that the ABC Test has spurred them to move quickly to try and eliminate the "threat" this new test could impose.
However, earlier this week, Gig Workers Rising, gathered outside Uber's headquarters in San Francisco to voice their opposition to any proposed legislation which would classify these gig workers as independent contractors.  (The Gig Workers Rising Twitter feed has a bit of background on Tuesday's protest.)  Something tells me this is not the last we have heard on the matter...from either side.


Nevada Employers: Re-Think Refusing to Hire That Applicant With a Positive Marijuana Test

On June 5th, Nevada Governor Steve Sisolak signed a bill into law that prohibits employers in the state from refusing to hire a job applicant on the basis of a positive marijuana test.  (However, there are few exceptions that are carved out, namely for those applying to be a firefighter or emergency medical technician.)  When this law takes effect January 1, 2020, employees will also have the ability to challenge the results of an initial drug screening if employers require one within the first 30 days of hiring.  Employers must then consider a second screening test (paid for by the employee.)  As this article from HRDive shows, there are a hosts of things for multi-state employers to consider, given the varying degree in which many states view marijuana.


Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Paid Parental Leave Policy Popular Among Staff

Perhaps we should file this article under, ‘not a surprise.’  Recently, I had made note of New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s paid parental leave policy for her staff: 12 weeks of paid leave for new parents on her staff.  Apparently there were several expectant parents on her staff and one was interviewed for this article.  I will let readers page through the interview, but the one takeaway here is the reference to this paid leave policy being one of the best provided to Congressional staffers in D.C.  With Representative Ocasio-Cortez being only a freshman legislator, it will be interesting to see if more established legislators follow suit with similar paid leave policies of their own.


New York Adopts New Paid Time Off Law to Allow Workers to Vote

Earlier this year, the State of New York revised a paid time off to vote law for workers in the state.  Under the revised law, all employees that are registered to vote may request a maximum of three hours of paid time off to vote in any public election without experiencing a loss in pay.  Prior to this revision, if an employee had four or more consecutive hours outside of work while the polls were open, it was presumed that the employee was not entitled to paid time off to vote.  Of note, with this revision to the law, that four hour window has been eliminated.  Employers and employees in New York should all take note of this change in the law.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per