Skip to main content

Chattanooga, Tennessee Volkswagen Workers Reject Union (Again)


Late last week, another union election was held at a Chattanooga, Tennessee Volkswagen plant in which workers voted 833 - 776 against unionizing after a three day election.  

For those unaware, this Volkswagen plant has been at the center stage of an ongoing unionization effort that has stretched out over the past few years.  (A 2014 election came close as well but ultimately failed.)  There has long been a simmering battle by the United Automobile Workers (the union that sought to represent workers at the plant) and those on the pro-employer side which have fought unionization efforts.  For labor leaders, they have viewed expanding into the south as paramount and have seen unionizing the Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga as the linchpin to starting that movement.  Of note, labor leaders have argued that a union is necessary to better advocate for the rights of workers in the south and fight for better wages and working conditions.

However, there has been fierce resistance to unionization of the Volkswagen plant.  In fact, Republican Governor Bill Lee spoke out in April and urged workers at the plant not to unionize, saying "Based on my personal experience of working with hundreds of skilled trades people over 35 years, when I have a direct relationship with you, the worker, and you're working for me, that is when the environment works best."  As well, a Republican State Representative said that a decision to unionize could threaten tens of millions of dollars in future state incentives for Volkswagen.  Politicians in the state were not the only ones making their opposition to the union known.  Some anti-union workers at the plant stated they did not need the United Automobile Workers ("UAW") to speak for them when the workers already had a voice at the plant.

At this point, the National Labor Relations Board still must certify the results.  After that occurs, any legal challenges could be made to the results of the election.  Whether that will result in any change is impossible to say for now.  However, for the time being, last week's vote certainly provides further evidence that in certain parts of the country, union resistance remains strong.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per