Skip to main content

Updated: U.S. Supreme Court Limits An Employer’s Procedural Defense to Job Discrimination Suits


Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court released its decision in the Fort Bend County v. Davis case, which addressed whether an employment discrimination claimant’s requirement that they present their claim to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) before filing suit is a jurisdictional prerequisite or a claim processing rule.  The Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have held that the exhaustion requirement to an employment discrimination claimant is jurisdictional, thus courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over claims that were never presented to the EEOC.  Eight Circuits go the other way, however, characterizing the exhaustion requirement as a claim processing rule that is subject to waiver, forfeiture, or other equitable defenses.

At the District Court level, after years of litigation, Fort Bend for the first time raised the defense that since Davis did not properly present her religious discrimination suit to the EEOC before filing suit, her case should be dismissed.  Finding the presentment claim was jurisdictional in nature, the District Court dismissed the case.  On appeal, the Fifth Circuit reversed, finding that since the presentment claim was properly characterized as a claim processing rule, Fort Bend’s failure to timely assert it meant that it was waived.  Fort Bend subsequently appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court in which oral arguments were held in late April.

In a unanimous ruling, the Court upheld the Fifth Circuit’s decision, finding that the requirement to file charges with the EEOC before filing suit was not a jurisdictional issue.  Writing for the Court, Justice Ginsburg noted that an employer can lose the ability to get a discrimination claim dismissed, based on a claimant’s failure to exhaust his or her claim with an agency, if the employer does not timely raise that defense.  As a result, the Court’s unanimous decision makes clear that the burden is on employers to promptly raise their objections to get a suit dismissed.  However, it is important to remember that the Court did not remove a claimant’s obligation to still exhaust their claim with an agency before Suit us filed.


For a copy of the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion:  https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-525_m6hn.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more