Skip to main content

Your Employee Gives Their Two Week Notice...Now What?


Most employers have been confronted with a similar situation:  An employee walks into the office/workplace and gives their two week notice.  The question that the employer then faces is simple...now what?  While simply saying "Ok" to the employee's resignation and going back to work is not the best way to handle the matter, it is important to take a few steps so there is no confusion about what will happen next.  While this resource is not the definitive guide on the topic and not intended to serve as legal advice (those experiencing a similar situation should consult their HR representative and/or employment law attorney for guidance), it provides a framework that can be referred to when needed.


The Employee Gives Their Notice

Let us start at the beginning, the employee walks into your office and gives their two week notice.  (Of course, not all employees give two week notice.  Some might give more, some might quit on the spot.)  As any good professional would advise, while an employee's decision to quit could be taken as a slight by the employer, it is important to remain level headed.  It might be a good idea to inquire about where the employee is going (they are likely excited about a new position and might express their interest in the new opportunity.  If that is the case, that is fine...we have all been in that boat before), congratulate them on the new position, and express regret about losing them.  Do not argue with the employee, threaten them, disparage them/their work not that they are leaving, etc.

Assuming the employee gives two week notice (or at least a few days), the employer must decide whether to let the employee remain on for that period of time or instead send them home immediately (with or without pay.)  Note, of course, the employer's decision will depend in part upon whether the employment relationship is at will or whether an employment contract exists.

As employers have likely come to see, losing a valued employee can be difficult.  As a result, there is often merit in letting the employee stay on so that the employer can find a replacement, ensure a smooth transition, etc.  However, if the employee was not one of the more stellar workers, this might make the decision easier for the employer.  I know I have been in a work environment before when a difficult employee gave their notice and the employer simply let them leave that same day.  Every situation is different, but I again caution employers to not let their emotions get the best of them and simply tell an employee to go home that same day (just because the employer is upset/hurt that the employee gave their notice.)  Without a transition plan in place, letting a good employee go that same day just to "save face" can make the transition much more difficult for the employer.


To Counter or Not to Counter, That is the Question

Upon receiving the employee's notice to quit, an employer might take steps to try and keep him/her.  While this likely does not apply in every situation, there are often employees that become an integral part of the operation and that an employer wants to keep.  If that is the case, it might be wise to inquire about the employee's new position and make a counter offer to keep them.  Of course, the employee might be burnt out, looking to move on regardless of what is offered, or is simply transitioning to a new phase of their career and therefore not interested in any counter offer made.  If that is the case, no harm no foul.  While it is always tough to lose a good employee, if a counter offer does not result in keeping the employee, all that can be done is for both parties to move on.


Paying the Employee

The decision over whether to pay the employee is often one of the first things to cross an employer's mind once they receive an employee's notice.  When an employer tells the employee to go home early or does not have them complete the entirety of the two weeks is when this can become a tricky situation.  As noted, the decision on whether to pay an employee that gives their resignation notice can depend in part upon whether the employee is at will, has an employment contract, what an employee manual says, etc.  Of course, if the employer allows the employee to stay on during the two weeks (or for any period after receiving the employee's notice), the employee will need to be paid for their actual work done...or the employer could risk facing an FLSA wage claim.  As a result, it is always a good idea to have a provision in an employee handbook which spells out how this payment situation will be handled.  That way, there is no confusion and a potential dispute over pay can be avoided.


Handling the Resignation With Other Employees

Remember when I mentioned above that employers should keep calm and not get upset when an employee gives their notice?  This is all that much more important when an employer addresses the matter with other employees.  (While some employers might want to remain silent, not say anything, and pretend nothing happened, when John Doe or Jane Doe suddenly stops coming into the office one day or someone takes their spot, employees are going to start wondering what happened.)  It is important not to play politics or bad mouth the employee.  Just imagine, what will other employees think when they hear their employer bad mouthing or disparaging that employee?  That is one way to certainly lower office morale...  Instead, addressing the matter with employees that John Doe or Jane Doe is leaving on XYZ date, a new employee will be starting on ABC date, while the company hates to lose John Doe or Jane Doe the company wishes him/her luck in their future endeavors, and any questions should be brought to HR, is a better way to handle the matter.


Conducting an Exit Interview - The Pros & Cons

Have readers ever seen The Office episode when Toby (from HR) quits and Michael is beyond excited when he remembers he gets to do the exit interview?  (For those unfamiliar with the show, Michael considered Toby his mortal enemy.  Unsurprisingly, Michael wanted to use the exit interview to make one final jab and needle Toby.)  While that scene is quite humorous, I would not advise employers to implement a similar strategy.  Instead, an effective exit interview can be used by an employer to ask the employee questions about the work environment, things that could be improved (both about the workplace and the position), and open the floor up to the employee to offer some thoughts.  

It would be likely that the employee would feel they could speak freely (without the fear of withholding comments or critiques as they might have done when they were still employed), so while an employer might be taken aback by some comments, it is important to listen carefully and not let pride get in the way.  While some employers might think they run a pristine operation, it is likely that improvements/changes could be made to make things more efficient.  Oftentimes, an employee that has been in the thick of things for a while might have a new idea on how to improve a task, streamline a process, etc. that the employer might not have realized.  

Of course, some employees might be spiteful (perhaps they are burnt out, upset with their employer for whatever reason, etc.) and attempt to complain, criticize, and use the exit interview to vent their frustrations.  If that is the case, the employer could always choose to steer the exit interview back on track or simply end it altogether.  I think this really comes down to how the exit interview flows and whether it seems to be a productive use of time or simply a waste for all involved.


Plan for the Road Ahead

Some states require employers to maintain employee records for a set number of years after the employment relationship ends.  Depending upon the laws in your state, it is imperative to not go on a rampage and shred documents once the employee walks out the door for the final time.  As well, it is also a good idea to retain employee records (including HR files, documented complaints, performance issues, etc.) in the event the employee turns around and files a discrimination, wage and hour, harassment suit (among other potential claims).  Retaining these documents could become imperative if it becomes necessary to defend against a suit down the road.


Do Not Burn Those Bridges

Regardless of the line of work or the size of the city, it is a small world out there.  All parties should attempt to leave the employment relationship amicably and not burn any bridges.  After all, maybe the grass is not greener on the other side or the new employee turns out to be a disappointment.  It is possible that in three months, both the employer and the employee that left will want to restart the employment relationship.  That can be hard to do if the employer argued with the employee over the resignation, took the matter personally and berated the employee, lambasted the employee for wanting to leave, etc.  (Keep in mind, this applies to employees as well...often, some employees that resign leave their position with very little grace and professionalism)  As much as it might seem to be helpful to vent and express any frustration over the resignation, this can often spell trouble down the road.  Be careful.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per