Skip to main content

The United Auto Workers Ramp Up Charges Against Nissan


Back in August, I made note of a union election at a Nissan plant in Mississippi.  That election, which resulted in a nearly 2 - 1 vote against unionization, was somewhat of a paramount moment in the fight of labor unions to get a footing in the south.  Leading up to the election, the United Auto Workers ("UAW") charged that Nissan engaged in unfair labor practices (including threats of shutting down the plant if the workers voted to unionize.)  

Since the results of the election were announced, the UAW has kept the pressure up and filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") on the grounds that Nissan's alleged unfair labor practices prevented a proper election from occurring.  In fact, a few weeks ago, the UAW filed an amended complaint with the NLRB and alleged that Nissan maintained (and continues to do so) an employee surveillance, data collection, and rating system which records employee union activity and subsequently rates the workers based on their perceived support or opposition to the union.  The UAW has asked the NLRB to subpoena Nissan and further investigate its claims.

Interesting enough, on Tuesday, two workers from the Nissan plant stated that they were "concerned" that something nefarious was occurring at the plant.  One of the employees, Eric Hearn, stated that he confronted his supervisor before the August election and asked whether Nissan rated the employees based upon their union stance.  Apparently Hearn's supervisor stated he was "quite sure" this occurred.  Another employee, Calvin Ealy, stated that at the request of Nissan, he provided information about how employees under his supervision were likely to vote in an election.  (Ealy, prior to his termination in 2013, worked as a supervisor.)

This is likely to continue to play out further in the coming weeks and months.  As noted, given the contentious fight for unionization at the plant leading up to the election (and the subsequent 2 - 1 vote against unionization), there are hard feelings, especially on the union's side.  While it is unclear whether there is any substance to these alleged unfair labor practices (and whether a new election would ultimately be ordered), I would fully expect the UAW to make this a seminal moment as it continues to fight to spread big labor in the south.


For additional information:  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-03/nissan-accused-of-snooping-in-labor-s-latest-fight-for-the-south

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more