Skip to main content

Illinois Governor Is On the Ropes In His Fight to Allow Right to Work Zones


I have previously referenced Republican Governor Bruce Rauner's attempts to allow local governments in Illinois to establish right to work zones.  A somewhat controversial proposal, given the Democratic make up and pro-labor history in the state, Governor Rauner has pushed for this to become a reality in the state.  This past September, Democrats sent Governor Rauner a bill that would prevent local governments from setting up right to work zones and instead give only the General Assembly the ability to create right to work policies.  Unsurprisingly, Governor Rauner vetoed that bill.  As has been mentioned before, this right to work zone dispute arose after the Lake County village of Lincolnshire approved a right to work ordinance in 2015 (that was subsequently struck down in federal court.)  Currently, that case is being appealed with Governor Rauner backing an appeal all the way to the United States Supreme Court.

Last Wednesday, Democrats sought to override the Governor's veto.  While the Senate had the votes to override the veto, the House fell one vote short.  What does that mean?  At this moment, the Governor's veto stands.  Of course that does not mean that right to work zones are now allowed in the state.  Instead, this simply means that the General Assembly has not been vested with the sole authority to create right to work policies in the state.  Could Democrats try again?  Certainly.  In fact, they are already planning another vote sometime in November.

Stay tuned.  I think it is certainly likely that Democrats will find the votes to override the Governor's veto.  If that occurs, I think you will see an increased interest among pro-employer groups to try and get this case before the Supreme Court.  At that point, it might be their only hope to blunt or at least minimize the impact of this proposed law.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more