Skip to main content

Illinois Governor Is On the Ropes In His Fight to Allow Right to Work Zones


I have previously referenced Republican Governor Bruce Rauner's attempts to allow local governments in Illinois to establish right to work zones.  A somewhat controversial proposal, given the Democratic make up and pro-labor history in the state, Governor Rauner has pushed for this to become a reality in the state.  This past September, Democrats sent Governor Rauner a bill that would prevent local governments from setting up right to work zones and instead give only the General Assembly the ability to create right to work policies.  Unsurprisingly, Governor Rauner vetoed that bill.  As has been mentioned before, this right to work zone dispute arose after the Lake County village of Lincolnshire approved a right to work ordinance in 2015 (that was subsequently struck down in federal court.)  Currently, that case is being appealed with Governor Rauner backing an appeal all the way to the United States Supreme Court.

Last Wednesday, Democrats sought to override the Governor's veto.  While the Senate had the votes to override the veto, the House fell one vote short.  What does that mean?  At this moment, the Governor's veto stands.  Of course that does not mean that right to work zones are now allowed in the state.  Instead, this simply means that the General Assembly has not been vested with the sole authority to create right to work policies in the state.  Could Democrats try again?  Certainly.  In fact, they are already planning another vote sometime in November.

Stay tuned.  I think it is certainly likely that Democrats will find the votes to override the Governor's veto.  If that occurs, I think you will see an increased interest among pro-employer groups to try and get this case before the Supreme Court.  At that point, it might be their only hope to blunt or at least minimize the impact of this proposed law.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...