Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Player protests in the NFL have dominated the news cycle for several weeks now (with it likely to continue for the foreseeable future).  While we will not delve into the specifics of these protests, an article from The New York Times makes this topic applicable to this blog as that New York Times article addresses whether the National Labor Relations Act provides "protection" for these players.  Even for those who have heard enough about the protests, this article is well worth a read as it provides some guidance on how things could play out if a player were terminated for protesting, sued their employer (the NFL team/owner), and the matter played out in court.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Is Universal Basic Income the Next Frontier For Democrats?

Forget "Fight for $15", it appears that some Democrats (or at the very least, progressives) are seeking to make universal basic income the next rallying cause.  Universal basic income, for those unfamiliar with the term, is the ideal that every citizen would receive a regular stipend from the government as a way to bolster the social safety net, combat wage stagnation, and account for job loss as a result of automation.  In recent weeks, former Vice President Joe Biden has announced his reluctance to back universal basic income, while the progressive "champion" Bernie Sanders has thrown his weight beyond the movement.  While I think we are still a long, long, longggg way from universal basic income becoming a realistic possibility in the country, this could be the next cause that becomes a major talking point in politics.


NFL Player Protests & the NLRA

Without getting too far into the weeds, I am sure that many readers are aware of the protests that some NFL players are engaging in during the national anthem (and President Donald Trump's recent calls for NFL owners to fire any player who participates in these protests).  The question inevitably turns to could these protests be protected under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")?  Noam Scheiber at The New York Times provides a concise answer:  Yes.  Under the NLRA, an employee's action must be conducted in concert with co-workers; address an issue of relevance to their job; and be carried out using appropriate means.  Noam goes more in depth on these three factors and how they apply in this case...certainly well worth a read for those curious about the topic.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies i...
Post a Comment
Read more

What I've Been Reading This Week

Recently, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Commissioner, Chai Feldblum, had her re-nomination on the brink, after Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee took steps to block it .  Readers might have heard that late last week, Commissioner Feldblum's re-nomination quietly slipped away and she tweeted out a thank you to supporters and friends, acknowledging that her time at the EEOC was over.  While there has not been much in the way of a further update in regard to that ongoing saga, we wait to see how things will play out at the EEOC, now that it has lost a quorum until additional Commissioners are confirmed by the Senate. For the time being, there are other developments for readers to review this week.  In particular, I call attention to the article on managing a wage & hour audit by the Department of Labor as well as steps an employer can take to better ensure compliance with the ADA. As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week. ...
Post a Comment
Read more