Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Legal Workforce Act


As with many employment and labor law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out. 

This is one to keep an eye on.


For those unfamiliar with E-Verify, this process checks the Social Security numbers of recently hired employees against the Social Security Administration and Department of Homeland Security Records to ensure the employee is eligible to work in the United States (and not improperly using someone's Social Security number in order to obtain employment.)  E-Verify is often used to ensure that illegal immigrants are not being hired by employers. 

Early last month, three Republican Congressman introduced the Legal Workforce Act (a/k/a H.R. 3711) which would ultimately phase in mandatory E-Verify participation for new hires in six month increments.  That implementation would begin on the date of enactment:

  • Businesses with more than 10,000 employees would have to comply within 6 months;
  • Businesses with 500 to 9,999 employees would have to comply within 12 months;
  • Businesses with 20 to 499 employees would have to comply within 18 months;
  • Businesses with 1 to 19 employees would have to comply within 24 months; and
  • Employees performing "agricultural labor or services" would be subject to an E-Verify check within 30 months.

The bill would also allow employers a one time, 6 month extension of the initial phase in.

Note, the Legal Workforce Act also provides additional changes to E-Verify (such as making E-Verify completely electronic; permit employers to use E-Verify to check the work eligibility of current employees; and grant employers a safe harbor "defense" from prosecution if they use E-Verify in good faith and show that through no fault of their own, they received an incorrect eligibility confirmation; among other proposed revisions).  Whether the Legal Workforce Act will pass as is (or whether some of these revisions to the current way E-Verify operates are cut) remains to be seen.  However, with the three Republican Congressman who proposed this legislation spearheading the effort, it is certainly possible that a Republican controlled Congress will eventually pass this bill.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more