Skip to main content

Tampa Bay: First it Was the Pom Poms, Now its the Food Vendors


Oh what a rough year for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.  First, a former Tampa Bay cheerleader sued the team earlier this year for alleged wage and hour violations for failure to pay minimum wage.  (Tampa Bay Cheerleader Lawsuit).  Then, there have been the actual games this season which have bordered on embarrassing.  Now, there is an issue over the food vendors at the stadium and how they were compensated.  

Late last month, a story broke in Florida about several professional sports teams (along with the Daytona 500 and the Florida state fair) using a local shelter to provide food vendors to work at games and then the food vendors subsequently gave their wages to the shelter in return for free food and a place to live.  

In this instance, New Beginnings is a shelter in Florida that houses many drug and alcohol addicted residents.  The arrangement saw New Beginnings "supply" teams, such as the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Tampa Bay Rays, and Tampa Bay Lightning, with New Beginnings shelter residents to work games and after the workers had been paid for their work, the money went directly to New Beginnings.  In return for the residents turning over their pay, New Beginnings gave these workers shelter and food.  A report from the Tampa Bay Times found that New Beginnings brought in $932,816 in income last year.   

Getting down to brass tacks, it is not illegal to compensate workers with food and shelter.  However, in order to do so, a company must provide evidence that the value of their compensation equals or exceeds what the workers would earn through federal minimum wage.  This will be an interesting issue to see unfold.  At this time, no lawsuit has been filed, but the Department of Justice has gotten involved and begun to investigate.

UPDATE:  After I wrote the above post, I came across a Deadspin article that stated the Tampa Bay Buccaneers have since decided to end its relationship with New Beginnings in regard to using these particular "employees".  That does not necessarily mean that any investigation will stop or impending charges will be halted, however.  This will be one to continue to keep an eye on.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more