Skip to main content

YOLO Indeed: 100 Hugs & a Kiss Do Not Amount to Sexual Harassment


Zetwick v. County of Yolo - United States District Court, Eastern District of California


Facts:  Victoria Zetwick was a former corrections officer in Yolo County's Sheriff's Department.  During the course of her 14 years there, she alleged that her employer violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and subjected her to sexual harassment after he gave her at least 100 hugs and a kiss.  Zetwick claimed that the Sheriff hugged her at least 100 times in "awkward, unsolicited, and unwelcome" encounters.  As for the kiss?  The Sheriff apparently gave her a kiss half on the corner of her lips and half on her cheek. Zetwick subsequently filed a Government Claim in February 2012 and the Sheriff apparently never hugged or kissed her again. 

Holding:  The District Court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Zetwick could not establish a valid sexual harassment claim.  In order to reach this conclusion, the Court pointed to the fact that this behavior was common in Zetwick's workplace.  Zetwick had acknowledged that she was not the only person subjected to the hugs.  Zetwick even admitted to hugging other deputies, corrections officers, and supervisors at her work.  

The Court further found that the Sheriff's hugs were not exclusively directed towards women, as the Sheriff also hugged male employees in the office.

As for the kiss?  The Court held that was not enough for a sexual harassment claim to succeed as the kiss was apparently in the presence of Zetwick's husband and was done to congratulate her on her recent marriage.

Judgment:  The District Court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and held that the complained of hugs and kiss by Zetwick were not enough for her to prevail on her sexual harassment claim as this conduct, taken as a whole, was commonplace in Zetwick's workplace.

The Takeaway:  Well that is certainly an interesting case.  Without a doubt, Yolo is the right name for this county.  I would not suggest that employers go out and engage in this same behavior.  I think this holding should be read rather narrowly and seen as more of a fact specific ruling.  I cannot think of a lot of courts that would find this type of behavior to be generally acceptable; I certainly would think that over 100 hugs and a kiss in the office (that are unsolicited) would certainly be sufficient grounds to allege a valid sexual harassment claim.  But I guess if this conduct happens at the Yolo County Sheriff's Office...it truly is Yolo...

Majority Opinion Judge:  Judge Nunley

Date:  November 5, 2014

Opinion:  http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15073000648396664751&hl=en&as_sdt=6&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more