Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I have always enjoyed non-compete cases, articles, and blog posts.  I wrote an article on the topic a few years ago that the State Bar of Texas recognized as one of the top articles on the topic.  This week, I came across an article about a non-compete agreement that a doggy day care used.  Interesting reading, to say the least.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


A Unique Look at the Use of Background Checks

This is an interesting article which talks about one individual who went through a newly developed background check that can look into an applicant's background to see if there are any red flags (ie armed robbery convictions.  More on that later).  After talking about how his background check did not bring back anything relevant, there is a note on a former Smith and Wesson Holdings chairman who was revealed to been an armed robber with an armed robbery conviction.  Once this information came to light, he resigned.  But it begs the question:  If a background check is done properly (and legally), wouldn't this type of embarrassing situation have been avoided? 



File this news article under "interesting".  Camp Bow Wow is a doggy day care franchise with over 100 locations in the U.S.  Camp Bow Wow boards pets overnight and also offers in home pet sitting.  However, before a Camp Bow Wow employee can begin work, they have to sign non-compete agreements.  The non-compete includes a stipulation that the employee agrees not to work for a competing business within 25 miles of their Camp Bow Wow location for a period of two years following termination.  

I have heard of non-competes in white collar jobs, but a non-compete as to workers at Camp Bow Wow?  Talk about a potentially "ruff" situation. 



This is a good article by Suzanne Lucas that talks about some Walmart stores that are asking employees to donate to needy co-workers this year.  While this is not the first year it has happened (some Walmart stores also did food drives for its workers last year too), it has still generated some negative reactions.  A lot of opponents of the food drives point to the fact that if Walmart paid a decent wage, these type of programs would not be necessary to keep fellow employees from going hungry. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more