Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Shorter week for me as I have been out of the office all week on vacation and in court.  As a result, I am lighter on time than normal, so excuse the brief post.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.



Service Animals in the Workplace

I normally do not come across many articles on service animals in the workplace and how an employer should handle this situation.  With that being said, I came across this article and it has some good thoughts and practical pointers that I thought readers would enjoy.  In particular, note that the article advises employers on how to act when an employee and a customer require the use of a service animal in the workplace.  As well, do not forget the last part of the article which highlights the two questions that an employer can ask as to the use of service animals in the workplace.


Three Things A General Counsel Should Watch Out For With a Company's Instagram Page

I would suggest that any owner/executive/manager of any company should be mindful of what is on its company's social media pages.  In this particular article though, Daniel Taylor has a few quick thoughts on what a general counsel of a company should look out for if a company has an Instagram page.  The three highlighted areas are somewhat commonsense for many general counsels...but still worth reviewing.



The Evil HR Lady is a well written blog that I take a look at every week.  This week, she detailed a situation in which she was terminated from her position as a writer for MoneyWatch and how things have played out as a terminated employee.  Normally she is on the employer's side doing the actual termination...but this is an interesting, albeit short, perspective of sitting on the other side of the termination table.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per