Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Hazard pay has been a recurring topic over the past year.  Readers will recall reading about developments on that front a few times.  A recent article from Politico provides a bit of an update on the matter but although there is a bit of a silver lining...some employers are feeling the pinch.  That particular article is worth leading things off this week.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Long Beach’s Hazard Pay For Grocery Workers Spurs Others to Follow Suit

Alexander Nieves over at Politico wrote a recent article in which he recognized that following the Long Beach City Council approving an additional $4/hour in pay for grocery workers back in January, 37 other cities and counties followed suit and approved additional pay (in the $4 - $5/hour range) for grocery and front line retail workers.  While the article notes that this has proven to be a success (in drawing in and retaining workers), there is also a wary nod to the fact that some smaller employers have been (or likely soon will be) unable to keep up and afford this sudden increase in labor cost.  That ultimately results in large scale employers such as Amazon, Ralph’s Grocery, etc. being able to outlast their smaller competitors and eventually gain increased market share.  The big takeaway here:  While an increase in pay for some workers during the coronavirus pandemic has been beneficial to the workers, some employers a struggling to stay afloat.


Pennsylvania Ruling Regarding Paying Workers For Time Spent in Security Line Could Have Broader Impact

Earlier this month, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a ruling and held that workers at an Amazon warehouse that spent time in line for security screening were entitled to compensation under the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act.  (Readers might recall that a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case, Integrity Staffing v. Busk, held that under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Portal to Portal Act, workers did not need to be compensated for time spent in security screening.)  Confused?  Let us clear things up.  As the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held, while federal laws spell out an employer’s minimum obligations (as set up in the FLSA), states can impose additional obligations (here’s looking at you, Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act.)  Following this ruling, as this Bloomberg article suggests, employees might use this Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling to argue that they are now entitled to compensation for time spent getting screened for Covid (or related health screenings in the workplace.)  If nothing else, it is almost a certainty that we will start to see cases over the coming months (and years) that rely upon this Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling to argue that time spent in security and health checks in the workplace amounts to compensable time.


Workers Stage Virtual & In Person Walkout Following Activation Blizzard’s Response to Harassment Suit

The Wall Street Journal published an article on Wednesday in which it noted the ongoing turmoil swirling at Activation Blizzard following the company’s response to a harassment suit filed against the company recently.  That suit, which alleges widespread harassment against female workers at the company along with claims that male workers are paid more than their female counterparts, has started to pick up traction in the news media.  Although Activation Blizzard stated it would contest the charges in the suit while also expressing empathy for those that felt mistreated at the company, that did little to quell this week’s walk out.  It will be interesting to see how this suit plays out in the months ahead.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie Vetoes Minimum Wage Hike

A few months ago, readers might remember that I pointed out that the New Jersey Legislature had voted to approve a minimum wage hike in the state .  Under the approved legislation, the minimum wage rate would rise to $10.10/hour in the next year and at least $15/hour over the next five.  (The current minimum wage rate in the state is $8.38/hour).  In that article, I had noted that the bill was then going to go before Governor Chris Christie for his approval or veto. As I had suggested previously, I thought that the Governor would likely veto the bill based upon his prior actions and comments on similar legislation.  Well, a few days ago, Governor Christie did just that and vetoed the bill on the grounds that it "would trigger an escalation of wages that will make doing business in New Jersey unfathomable."  Pointing to the increase in hourly minimum wage rates, the Governor referred to the bill as a "really radical increase."  (It is interesting to c...
Post a Comment
Read more