Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Northwest Grocery Association & Washington Food Industry Association v. City of Seattle (U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington at Seattle)


As with many labor & employment related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Last week, two grocery industry trade groups filed suit against the city of Seattle on the grounds that the city’s $4/hour hazard pay increase for certain grocery store worker interferes with the collective bargaining process between grocery stores and unions.

That $4/hour hazard pay increase, the Hazard Pay for Grocery Employees Ordinance, went into effect last Wednesday.  The ordinance applies to large grocers, specifically those with more than 500 employees statewide and grocery stores larger than 10,000 square feet in the city.  The $4/hour pay boost applies to all workers at these locations and remains in effect for as long as Seattle remains in a declared civil emergency.

According to the lawsuit, this ordinance is unlawful as it is “invalid and unconstitutional.”  In particular, the trade groups allege that the ordinance is preempted by federal law governing collective bargaining and labor practices.  In addition, the trade groups claim the ordinance violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. and Washington Constitutions by treating large grocers differently “without providing any reasonable justification for the exclusion of other employers or frontline retail workers.”

It is expected that the city of Seattle will contest the lawsuit. While this is still in the early stages of litigation, it is one to keep an eye on going forward.


For a copy of the complaint:  https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20470244-grocers-association-lawsuit

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more