Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

As things start to get back to normal (in terms of courts holding in person hearings and trials), I suspect the work from home routine of the past 15 months will change a bit.  With that increased travel comes a bit less time to read through articles like I had been used to lately.  This week was no exception with an in person trial taking place...which is quite the change from doing things virtually via Zoom, Teams, etc.  However, there were still a few good articles worth highlighting.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Minimum Time Off: The Next Big Thing?

MTO (or minimum time off) is a trend that is starting to take hold in some workplaces.  As this article from HRDive notes, some employers have unlimited paid time off..although that time off policy is not necessarily all it is cracked up to be.  The article points out that some studies have found that workers with unlimited paid time off actually take off less time compared to those that receive a set amount of paid time off each year.  However, a new trend that is starting to emerge is employer providing workers with minimum time off wherein workers are required to take a set number of days off each year.  As always, results will vary, but this article provides an interesting perspective that is worth considering for some employers and HR professionals.


Minimum Wage Rates In the Fast Food Industry...Going Up?

CNBC published a recent article in which it noted that while McDonald’s has pledged to increase the hourly pay rate at its corporate owned locations, the question has turned to whether the franchisee owned locations will follow suit.  As the article notes, one franchisee owner in the northwest has decided to raise pay rates ($13/hour for junior staff and $20/hour for managers.)  Of course, this is only one franchisee but the article speculates that other McDonald’s franchisees will follow suit as the fast food industry seeks to retain (and draw in) workers in an already tight labor market.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more