Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

As things start to get back to normal (in terms of courts holding in person hearings and trials), I suspect the work from home routine of the past 15 months will change a bit.  With that increased travel comes a bit less time to read through articles like I had been used to lately.  This week was no exception with an in person trial taking place...which is quite the change from doing things virtually via Zoom, Teams, etc.  However, there were still a few good articles worth highlighting.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Minimum Time Off: The Next Big Thing?

MTO (or minimum time off) is a trend that is starting to take hold in some workplaces.  As this article from HRDive notes, some employers have unlimited paid time off..although that time off policy is not necessarily all it is cracked up to be.  The article points out that some studies have found that workers with unlimited paid time off actually take off less time compared to those that receive a set amount of paid time off each year.  However, a new trend that is starting to emerge is employer providing workers with minimum time off wherein workers are required to take a set number of days off each year.  As always, results will vary, but this article provides an interesting perspective that is worth considering for some employers and HR professionals.


Minimum Wage Rates In the Fast Food Industry...Going Up?

CNBC published a recent article in which it noted that while McDonald’s has pledged to increase the hourly pay rate at its corporate owned locations, the question has turned to whether the franchisee owned locations will follow suit.  As the article notes, one franchisee owner in the northwest has decided to raise pay rates ($13/hour for junior staff and $20/hour for managers.)  Of course, this is only one franchisee but the article speculates that other McDonald’s franchisees will follow suit as the fast food industry seeks to retain (and draw in) workers in an already tight labor market.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...