Skip to main content

Breaking: U.S. Supreme Court’s Ruling Allows Minor League Minimum Wage Class Action to Proceed Ahead

 

Earlier today, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a request by Major League Baseball (“MLB”) to take up an unlawful wage class action lawsuit brought by minor league baseball players, which means the case will likely proceed ahead to a trial setting.

As a bit of background, a group of minor league baseball players had filed suit against MLB several years ago on the grounds that they were earning less than $7,500.00 per year, in violation of federal law.  (For years, minor league baseball players have earned less than the minimum wage rate, which has been a source of contention.)  The lawsuit, Senne v. Royals, is comprised of both current and former players who seek back pay for hours worked.  The lawsuit bounced around a bit in the lower courts with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issuing a ruling last year that allowed the suit to proceed as a class action.  

Readers might recall that in 2018, the Save America’s Pastime Act was introduced which sought to strip minor league baseball players of minimum wage protections.  While that law went into effect, this lawsuit was brought in an effort to circumvent the pay restrictions placed on minor league baseball players.

While the Supreme Court did not state their reason for denying MLB’s appeal, and should not be constructed as the Supreme Court deciding the merits of the case either way, the lawsuit lives to see another day.


For additional information:  https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/supreme-court-clears-way-for-class-action-lawsuit-from-minor-league-players-being-paid-below-minimum-wage/amp/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more