Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

Another week down and another debate in the books.  Following last week’s debate between President Donald Trump and Democratic candidate Joe Biden, Vice President Mike Pence and Senator Kamala Harris sat down on Wednesday to talk about several topics ahead of the November 3rd election.  While I will refer readers to other resources which dissect that debate in minute detail (including the cameo appearance by a particular fly), a recent podcast on social media posts and the 2020 election is relevant to this week’s political developments and Wednesday’s debate.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


President Trump Issues Executive Order Banning Racial Sensitivity Training

At the end of September, President Donald Trump issued an executive order in which he banned training that involved race and sex based discrimination.  The executive order is quite far reaching as it applies to executive departments and agencies, the U.S. military, federal contractors, and federal grant recipients.  Although note, that this does not extend to private employers (so long as they do not have federal contracts.)  In his remarks following the release of the executive order, President Trump stated the ban was needed to do away with training that perpetuated stereotypes and division.  Critics have been quick to call this executive order as an attempt to whitewash America’s history and risks exposing minorities to an onslaught of discrimination in the workplace.  Regardless of which way you lean on this matter, I would suggest giving the text of the executive order  review and forming your own thoughts.


Conducting Performance Reviews in the Age of COVID-19 & Work From Home

Pamela DeLoatch over at HRDive recently wrote an article that addressed how employers can conduct performance reviews, given that many employees continue to work remotely.  The main takeaway:  Be flexible and willing to adapt, given that the work environment has changed.  With that being said, regardless of whether you are an employer or employee, this article is worth reviewing.


Employees, Social Media Posts, & the 2020 Election

Earlier this month, David Weisenfeld, Jon Hyman, and Robin Shea sat down to talk about the use of social media by employees during the 2020 election cycle.  While readers can listen to the podcast in their free time, there is a transcript of the discussion available for those that would prefer that option.  In short, while each situation is different and there is no clear cut rule to apply in all situations, generally speaking, employers can hold employees responsible for posts on their social media accounts (including during this election cycle.)  This podcast/transcript is well worth reviewing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more