Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: Paid Leave Edition


As I had highlighted earlier this week a paid leave “battle” in New Hampshire between the Republican Governor and the Democratic Legislature, I thought it would be appropriate to highlight some other developments across the country in regard to paid leave.  With paid leave on the ballot this November, there is no time like the present to do a bit of a deep dive into the topic.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


How Realistic Is a National Paid Leave Law?

Ah yes, paid leave.  One of the more bandied about labor and employment law related topics.  While there appears to be support among both Republicans and Democrats for a national paid leave law, neither side can come to an agreement with the other on how it would be funded, whether it would be mandatory, which workers would qualify, etc.  This particular study from AEI examines the issue a bit closer and takes into account how a national paid leave law would impact low wage workers.  For those interested in a well thought out study on the topic, this is worth a read.


Study: Two Thirds of Small Business Owners Support Paid Leave

On the heels of the above article from AEI, I point readers to a recent study that was conducted in which it was found that two thirds of small business owners support paid leave.  The study, conducted by the non-profit Paid Leave for All, appears to show widespread support among “Mom and Pop” businesses around the country.  Perhaps one of the more telling signs that this support for paid leave is not just a fluke is the fact that the Director of Paid Leave for All, Dawn Huckelbridge, points out that over the years there has been consistent support for paid leave.  Rather than this being a flash in the pan or somewhat of an outlier study, it appears that contrary to what many might believe, small business owners have been (and continue to be) supports of paid leave.


On the Ballot This November: Colorado’s Proposition 118

Voters in Colorado this year have the option to vote on Proposition 118, a proposed paid family and medical leave ballot initiative.  The Proposition, if approved, would provide Colorado workers with 12 weeks of paid time off to care for a new child, recover from a personal illness or injury, care for a sick or injured family member, or address needs related to domestic violence, sexual assault, or a family member’s military deployment.  (Four additional weeks would also be provided to workers experiencing complications from pregnancy.)  As The Colorado Time Recorder writes, with nearly 80% of Colorado workers not having access to paid family or medical leave, Proposition 118 could impact a wide swath of workers in the state.  Critics of the Proposition argue that it would be too costly (as the paid leave would be funded by both employers and employees paying .45% of the employees’ wage into the program.  This would amount to $3.83/week for the average worker.)  In a state that leans to the left and with a contested Senate race on the ballot (during a Presidential election year no less), I would expect voter turnout to be high.  If I were a betting man, I would expect to see Proposition 118 pass.  Stay tuned.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more