Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Prada v. Trifecta Productions, LLC (U.S District Court, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division)


As with many employment and labor law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


At the end of August, a rather novel (for the time being) lawsuit was filed by an employee that alleged his former employer unlawfully interfered and retaliated against him in violation of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”).

According to the lawsuit, Nicolas Prada (“Prada”) worked as a waiter and assistant manager at Trifecta Productions, LLC d/b/a Tomukun Noodle Bar (“Noodle Bar”).  In late June, he began experiencing coronavirus related symptoms and stayed home from work.  After testing positive three days later and quarantining for fourteen days, he texted his employer that he was medically cleared to return to work.  However, during a call with the owner of Noodle Bar, Prada claims he was interrogated about his actions prior to testing positive for the coronavirus.  The owner of Noodle Bar allegedly questioned Prada about whether he had “been out partying and acting irresponsible” and claimed that because of evidence on social media of Prada having been out in a crowd, Prada should “begin looking for work” and it was best for him to not return to the Noodle Bar.

The day after this conversation with the owner of Noodle Bar, Prada quit and brought his lawsuit against his former employer.

While this lawsuit has only recently been filed and there has not been much action so far, I would suspect that we will see similar lawsuits be filed against employers in the coming months.  Whether an employer can (or even should) terminate an employee in this situation can depend.  For instance, if an employer has a legitimate, non discriminatory, and non retaliatory reason for terminating an employee, there might be some “cover” to avoid liability under the FFCRA.  However, as others have noted, given that these cases are fact intensive and will likely vary based upon the fact set, I do not think we can apply one rule for all cases.


For a copy of the complaint in this case:  https://public.boxcloud.com/d/1/b1!rs066TjvbF3sDNKva_fNd6NgSPB5U---hbMz8hjFJF1REQWk5WJcAhNQrAwqkA4AXHsLfkFN5sDDGA-mUUNSEFTO4Ztgzt6yHuNYPukbO8DNWSmc1e9r43KKPa7qNsgMW97ewmJaF_8yDrnEz41vgTLoEIWkZv8NSAbJT1OjSe3Pn2tatbRVvjb1FRbQmB-SzVJK1NycgrFbAkVLKabvwGhQGwYQzIRTRDdFi5PdrWC8giRBW7UviN6atUEU7TIpe_p0HX2QS3xw_D6bsSt3OKboDyEqXsDKORvDopKkEhcIftR38FB_Btq-2GNkHMH20eZ3XBk0zII-rjBw0cGMF-7bkFnV9cusXWE1y8vyEa6MT4k8F7oqMClTHEURa3A9ZeZFzrU4GeSoa5VEhMWfiNzz-IXOGWNUhtft1Be01pFqFgcGSGBVkYnyJ0-Kyflv5gkXx5SUZ4T8p7nNT16WW7ArRZZ-0hHAKnM1bq0nLaKOOMWbjIO6ayK7HDZh5sOumtHoFngxCXdN4HRMrIQ6pUwJr2hAE02dUx2RncuklxFSGefhahEeQNelRZz8p3jc4bnX1lAQpCRHug_YhwVY8pgmQEV3YPbgdUE3cKs7r0E8pm-KYZ-bv88Cns5fNgBy275AOjFneZm0QoOBYGKHoTEfpOheTuYTHQgYS7DnQ7F7rhoGFcBCM_urKYPvrPR4kkHr-y3LxHmUESLuSMbEA0IwLsUHt4Lwo7QKZUn0UpA7psYUTtIHEE6h9NklYuoMaLImkmtNmn8edoYCQbI2zdkQVEct8umUPum3LRXsq7caYkKOz45ELbWrlutKcxctlcm2evB5et1LlRY6nwwIwZJY3FBBzh3KykfsQHL8dr4sTXH4SpNoVVpS3SxkpkWzOBSfAV--hUbFY7-T7E67IZ5mVleJdlz669dFrfPL6dn5delgf-blgnoSmfOEM6YUPUCevYLsr4CO4hA_Ek_5-W7XJUcNO3C8r1S0OKHZ0c-AwifFv5fyRlN5MtTsvKOcjkB2AJ0v9TLPSTFuDgmoOZK0XyDWQfBk8VTIv_omr1PguY2fZDS5q7meP_sUd81_6zEDbmYIRz52HIvYxOrZ-ErfgZy7wsl9ekikg8QXrHDbtEqrHI98BNDKFBmWiU4VQdaMa5zhXpmtOQWayjWj4cTLmq8Fa8jLS9TK6FKV8PoEfgpJqg4nm0CyJemC84eua8EuRAH2NeC6T3fL1fO316xjvdiLhbXo9XZprQbtFZFY5KiXexdeJ_bYFZOG79Np6GixVlOjzdLoSmuWgw92CA../download

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more