Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

Some readers might have watched the confirmation hearings this week for President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court Justice nominee, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett.  As Judge Barrett spent a good portion of the week answering questions from Senators as to why she should be confirmed to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, there were not any “major” smoking guns or shocking revelations.  However, with many predicting that Judge Barrett will be confirmed to fill the vacant Supreme Court seat, I think it is a good time to look at how she might rule on labor and employment law related cases (based upon her prior rulings in relevant Seventh Circuit Cases.)

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


How Might a Justice Amy Coney Barrett Rule, If Confirmed?

HRDive published an article recently in which it weighed how a Justice Amy Coney Barrett might rule on labor and employment law related matters, if confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court.  While she only has three years experience on the bench and there are not a long line of cases to give us a “crystal ball” look into the future, it is widely suspected she might tend to favor employers in labor and employment disputes.  Of course, some Supreme Court Justices end up taking a different stance on issues once they get confirmed (compared to what was expected prior to confirmation.)  With that being said, this article is well worth a read.


Amazon Tech Workers Petition For Paid Time Off to Vote

A few thousand tech workers at Amazon have recently launched a petition asking the company to provide paid time off to vote.  (Readers might remember that paid time off, or lack thereof, is a hot topic leading up to the November 3rd election.)  Amazon has responded by pointing its employee to refer to the laws in place (depending the state) as to how request time off to vote and whether paid time off is offered.  Something tells me that this petition likely will not lead Amazon to implement a company wide policy to provide paid time off and will instead continue to defer to what each state stipulates.  Nevertheless, it is worth watching to see if this petition gains nationwide traction leading up to November 3rd.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more