Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I do not often post court opinions in the "What I've Been Reading This Week" posts, but this week was an exception after I read through the Texas Supreme Court opinion in a same sex sexual harassment case.  Although topping out at over 100 pages (including dissent), this opinion is worth a read as the Supreme Court parsed the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act and reviewed the facts in the record.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Spending Bill Exempting Minor League Baseball Players From FLSA Protections Could "Doom" Some Leagues

Chris Dugan wrote an article last week in which he surmised that the omnibus spending bill passed by Congress and signed into law by President Donald Trump could put some independent minor leagues out of business.  As readers might recall, the spending bill included a provision that minor league baseball players be paid at least the federal minimum age rate for a 40 hour work week (regardless of the hours worked).  However, this provision designates minor league players as seasonal/temporary workers and puts them under an exemption of the Fair Labor Standards Act (thus they are not entitled to overtime pay).  While this might mean a wage hike for some minor league players, some independent minor leagues are expected to struggle to find the extra pay for their players.  That likely means that some independent minor leagues will be faced with ceasing operation if they cannot pay their players in accordance with the new wage requirement.


Texas Supreme Court Holds Harassment By Same Sex Co-Worker is NOT Same Sex Harassment Under Texas Law

In a 6 - 2 decision (with Justice Blacklock not participating in the decision), the Texas Supreme Court issued a decision in Alamo Heights Independent School District v. Clark and held that harassment by a co-worker of the same sex does not amount to sexual harassment under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act ("TCHRA").  The Supreme Court's reversal of the court of appeals' decision (by such a definitive 6 - 2 ruling) is somewhat eye catching.  However, in the Court's lengthy analysis (and dissenting opinion), the majority opinion finds that the harassment was not because of the complaintant's gender, and as a result, no viable claim under the TCHRA existed.  While this opinion might be a bit much for some readers to digest (or care to even try paging through), it is worth a read when you have some time.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more