Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I do not often post court opinions in the "What I've Been Reading This Week" posts, but this week was an exception after I read through the Texas Supreme Court opinion in a same sex sexual harassment case.  Although topping out at over 100 pages (including dissent), this opinion is worth a read as the Supreme Court parsed the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act and reviewed the facts in the record.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Spending Bill Exempting Minor League Baseball Players From FLSA Protections Could "Doom" Some Leagues

Chris Dugan wrote an article last week in which he surmised that the omnibus spending bill passed by Congress and signed into law by President Donald Trump could put some independent minor leagues out of business.  As readers might recall, the spending bill included a provision that minor league baseball players be paid at least the federal minimum age rate for a 40 hour work week (regardless of the hours worked).  However, this provision designates minor league players as seasonal/temporary workers and puts them under an exemption of the Fair Labor Standards Act (thus they are not entitled to overtime pay).  While this might mean a wage hike for some minor league players, some independent minor leagues are expected to struggle to find the extra pay for their players.  That likely means that some independent minor leagues will be faced with ceasing operation if they cannot pay their players in accordance with the new wage requirement.


Texas Supreme Court Holds Harassment By Same Sex Co-Worker is NOT Same Sex Harassment Under Texas Law

In a 6 - 2 decision (with Justice Blacklock not participating in the decision), the Texas Supreme Court issued a decision in Alamo Heights Independent School District v. Clark and held that harassment by a co-worker of the same sex does not amount to sexual harassment under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act ("TCHRA").  The Supreme Court's reversal of the court of appeals' decision (by such a definitive 6 - 2 ruling) is somewhat eye catching.  However, in the Court's lengthy analysis (and dissenting opinion), the majority opinion finds that the harassment was not because of the complaintant's gender, and as a result, no viable claim under the TCHRA existed.  While this opinion might be a bit much for some readers to digest (or care to even try paging through), it is worth a read when you have some time.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more