Skip to main content

Missouri Republicans Move to Put Right to Work Measure on August Primary Ballot


Readers who follow this blog are well aware of attempts by Republicans in Missouri to make the state the next right to work state in the country.  (States with right to work laws provide that employees cannot be forced to join a union as a condition of employment nor can employees be required to pay union dues if they are not a member of the union.  These non-member union dues are often called ‘agency fees’ and are collected by unions, from non-members, to help pay for the collective bargaining that a union does on behalf of all employees, regardless of whether the employee is a member of the union or not).

After a few false starts over the past few years, Republicans in the state were able to pass a right to work bill last year.  Republican Governor Eric Greitens subsequently signed the bill into law and Republicans cheered (while Democrats and labor unions simmered).  However, pro labor supporters quickly regrouped and obtained enough signatures to put the right to work measure on the ballot in November so that voters in the state could decide whether to allow the law to stay in place.  (Currently, the law remains on hold until voters have a say).  Unsurprisingly, money started to pour into the fight as supporters on both sides of the matter sought to ramp up support for (and against) the upcoming November ballot measure.

But as the saying goes, hold the phone.  Yesterday, the House Econmic Development Committee in the state voted along party lines, 8 - 4, to put the right to work measure on the August primary ballot rather than on the November general election ballot.  Critics were quick to call this a ploy by Republicans to limit voter turnout against right to work.  As some readers might know, primary voter turnout is often lower than general election turnout.  Traditionally, Republicans vote in larger numbers in primaries than do Democrats.  Given that Republicans in Missouri are attempting to ensure the right to work measure passes (and Missouri remains a right to work state), Democrats have been quick to call foul.  

For the time being, Republicans are one step closer to having this measure placed on the August primary ballot.  The matter now heads to the full House for further debate and a vote.  Stay tuned.


For additional information:  http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/plan-to-move-missouri-s-right-to-work-vote-to/article_f6b3e253-6c91-5b9b-baf4-5e8a3eb7d61c.amp.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations