Skip to main content

President Trump's Nominee For NLRB Set to Have Final Vote Before Senate This Week


Recently, President Donald Trump nominated John Ring, a labor law attorney with Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, to fill a vacant seat on the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB").  The nomination cleared the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions last month and proceeded to the full Senate for further debate and a final vote.

The Senate is expected to hold a cloture vote on Ring's nomination in the next day or two, followed by up to 30 hours of debate on the nomination.  Those who are closely following Ring's nomination expect he will be confirmed along party lines (given that Republicans have majority control of the Senate).  

Assuming Ring gets confirmed, his inclusion as a Board member will give the NLRB a 3 - 2 majority control among Board members appointed by a Republican president.  The question would then turn to whether the NLRB would again try and reverse the Browning-Ferris joint employer standard that went into effect a few years ago.  I would expect there would be increased pressure on the NLRB to do so (after the Hy-Brand decision was vacated a few weeks ago).  Whether the NLRB could find a new case to vacate the joint employer standard (and avoid similar conflict of interest issues that plagued Board member Emanuel), remains to be seen.

Stay tuned.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more