Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

Every so often, I come across a rather unique resource on labor or employment law related matters whether it be a podcast, an opinion piece, or a flow chart that tackles a given topic.  This week, I came across a flow chart that takes readers through how to handle employee leave issues.  For those looking for a 30,000 foot view on the topic, this resource is well worth reviewing and keeping close by as related employee leave issues arise in the workplace.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Labor Department Expected to Issue Rule Related to Independent Contractor v. Employee Classification

Reuters has recently reported that the Labor Department is expected to publish a proposed rule shortly that would make it easier to classify workers as independent contractors rather than employees.  While the specifics of the proposed rule are not certain, it is expected the Labor Department would seek to scale back the multi factor test that is currently used in worker misclassification cases.  According to Reuters, the Labor Department should be publishing the proposed rule next week and is seeking to adopt a final rule by the end of 2020.  Stay tuned.


An Easy Reference For Leave Related Issues

What more can I say, this three page chart from the law firm of Kriha Boucek provides an easy to follow guide on how to handle a situation when an employee requests leave from work.  Whether an employee is requesting leave under the Family Medical Leave Act or because of the coronavirus, this resource provides a guide on how to handle the leave request and what (if anything) is required of the employee when the leave is requested.  Of course, sometimes a situation is not as cut and dry as using this three page chart.  However, it should provide employers and employees alike an easy to use resource on the matter.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more