Skip to main content

NLRB General Counsel’s Memo Reminds Employers That the Coronavirus Does NOT Excuse Labor Law Violations

 

Earlier this month, National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) General Counsel Peter Robb (“Robb”) released a six page memo in which he confirmed (not that there was widespread doubt) that even with the coronavirus pandemic disrupting workplaces for the past six months, that did not excuse labor law violations.

So what can employers do?  For starters, reviewing this memo would be a good idea.  Keep in mind the several situations that Robb highlighted as being potentially susceptible to labor law violations that have been a key focus of the NLRB as of late.  Second, it would be a good idea to review your workplace policies and procedures to make sure you are not running afoul of the National Labor Relations Act.  Third, as always, it is a good idea to consult a labor law attorney to provide guidance if you have particular questions or need additional advice.  (This blog is not intended, and never has been, here to provide legal advice.)  With the NLRB identifying protected concerted activity and collective bargaining as two particular areas of focus during the coronavirus pandemic (among a few others as set forth in the memo), it would be wise to pay particular attention to these areas as it relates to your workplace policies and procedures.  Employer should bear in mind that the memo confirms that using the coronavirus pandemic as an “excuse”  or way to avoid liability for labor law violations will not get you very far.


For a copy of Robb’s memo:  https://apps.nlrb.gov/link/document.aspx/09031d4583243d83

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...