Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


This week, there is something for everyone:  An update on several new pieces of labor & employment legislation in Kentucky, an amendment to California’s Assembly Bill 5, and a potential change to the way World Wrestling Entertainment wrestlers are classified (re being independent contractors rather than employees.)

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Kentucky House Democrats Release Ambitious Range of Litigation 

Earlier this week, Kentucky House Democrats released a list of legislation that they have introduced, with an emphasis on Kentucky workers.  Of note, the legislation includes raising the hourly minimum wage rate in the state to $15/hour, repealing the state’s right to work law, reinstituting a prevailing wage, requiring paid sick leave and parental leave be provided to workers, and allowing for collective bargaining for all public employees.  While the legislation is ambitious, with a Senate and House in Republican majority control, most of this legislation likely will not advance too far.


Spending on California’s Proposition 22 Ballot Initiative Sets Record

Ahead of November’s elections, in which California voters will have their say on Proposition 22, spending on the initiative has topped $181.4 million (and counting.)  For those unaware, Proposition 22 is a ballot initiative backed by gig companies (such as Uber & Lyft) which seeks to make it easier to classify drivers as independent contractors rather than employees.  Hot on the heels of the passage of California’s Assembly Bill 5, these gig companies have sought to make Proposition 22 their attempt to undo that legislation.  (Readers will likely recall that Assembly Bill 5 made it easier, in fact much easier, to classify gig workers as employees rather than independent contractors.)  As Michael Hiltzik at The Los Angeles Times writes, with over $181.4 million having already been spent on Proposition 22 (and with several weeks still to go before the November 3rd vote), it is widely expected that this record setting spending will continue to increase heading into the home stretch.  Whether it will be enough to secure approval of Proposition 22 remains unclear (and frankly, somewhat doubtful based upon the California electorate.)


Former Democratic Presidential Candidate Andrew Yang Ready to Bodyslam WWE’s Wrestler Classification

In recent days, it has become known that World Wresting Entertainment (“WWE”) has implemented a policy prohibiting its workers from using their ring name and personal name in outside ventures (such as Twitch streams, YouTube channels, Cameos, etc.)  While the specifics of this new policy are apparently still being hashed out, the initial announcement brought a wave of criticism toward the company.  That criticism included Andrew Yang stating that if Joe Biden were elected President and appointed him as Labor Secretary, he would target WWE’s policy of classifying its wrestlers as independent contractors rather than employees.  (That classification issue has long been a source of controversy with many questioning how the company can classify the wrestlers as independent contractors when their work is so heavily controlled by the WWE.)  Whether Joe Biden gets elected and whether Andrew Yang would be appointed Labor Secretary are anyone’s guess.  However, if I were Vince McMahon, Chairman and CEO of WWE, I would be somewhat wary of what headaches a Democratic administration could bring to the wrestler classification matter.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more